Park Karen M, Max Mitchell B, Robinovitz Elaine, Gracely Richard H, Bennett Gary J
The Neurobiology and Anesthesiology Branch, National Institute of Dental Research, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA Clinical Center Nursing Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.
Pain. 1995 Nov;63(2):163-172. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00029-R.
The importance of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated sensitization of central nervous system (CNS) neurons is well established in animal models of acute and chronic pain. A human model of central sensitization would be useful in screening new NMDA antagonists and establishing dose regimens for clinical trials in patients with pain related to sensitization of CNS neurons. We used this model to examine the effects of intravenous infusions of two centrally acting analgesics, the NMDA receptor antagonist ketamine and the morphine-like opioid agonist alfentanil. Twelve normal subjects completed a 3-session, randomized, double-blind, crossover study. From 25 to 60 min after capsaicin injection, subjects were given intravenous infusions of ketamine (mean dose: 32 mg), alfentanil (mean dose: 3075 micrograms), or saline placebo. Both drugs significantly reduced ongoing pain and pinprick-evoked hyperalgesia during the infusion. The reduction in allodynia evoked by light stroking was statistically significant only for alfentanil. Mean reduction +/- SEM relative to placebo were for ongoing pain: ketamine, 36 +/- 9%; alfentanil, 51 +/- 5%; area of pinprick hyperalgesia: ketamine, 34 +/- 7%; alfentanil, 35 +/- 7%; and area of mechanical allodynia: ketamine, 52 +/- 20%; alfentanil, 70 +/- 12%. Because the drugs were given systemically and produced side effects in all subjects, we cannot specify the site or sites of action nor conclusively rule out a non-specific 'active placebo' response as the cause for reduction of symptoms. Arguing against an 'active placebo' response, however, was the lack of analgesic effect of intravenous midazolam (mean dose; 3.4 mg, titrated to produce side effects of similar magnitude to ketamine and alfentanil) given at 145 min after capsaicin in 9 subjects who had received saline from 25 to 60 min. The results of this study suggest that neural systems sensitive to NMDA receptor antagonists and opioids participate in capsaicin-evoked pain phenomena, and support the feasibility of pharmacological studies using the intradermal capsaicin model.
N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体介导的中枢神经系统(CNS)神经元致敏作用在急慢性疼痛的动物模型中已得到充分证实。中枢致敏的人体模型将有助于筛选新型NMDA拮抗剂,并为与CNS神经元致敏相关疼痛患者的临床试验确定给药方案。我们使用该模型研究了静脉输注两种中枢性镇痛药的效果,即NMDA受体拮抗剂氯胺酮和吗啡样阿片类激动剂阿芬太尼。12名正常受试者完成了一项为期3个阶段的随机双盲交叉研究。在注射辣椒素后25至60分钟,受试者接受静脉输注氯胺酮(平均剂量:32毫克)、阿芬太尼(平均剂量:3075微克)或生理盐水安慰剂。两种药物在输注期间均显著减轻了持续疼痛和针刺诱发的痛觉过敏。轻触诱发的异常性疼痛减轻仅阿芬太尼具有统计学意义。相对于安慰剂的平均减轻幅度±标准误为:持续疼痛:氯胺酮,36±9%;阿芬太尼,51±5%;针刺痛觉过敏面积:氯胺酮,34±7%;阿芬太尼,35±7%;以及机械性异常性疼痛面积:氯胺酮,52±20%;阿芬太尼,70±12%。由于药物是全身给药且在所有受试者中均产生了副作用,我们无法确定作用位点,也不能确凿地排除非特异性“活性安慰剂”反应是症状减轻的原因。然而,在9名在25至60分钟接受生理盐水的受试者中,辣椒素注射后145分钟静脉注射咪达唑仑(平均剂量;3.4毫克,滴定至产生与氯胺酮和阿芬太尼相似程度的副作用)缺乏镇痛作用,这一事实反驳了“活性安慰剂”反应。本研究结果表明,对NMDA受体拮抗剂和阿片类药物敏感的神经系统参与了辣椒素诱发的疼痛现象,并支持了使用皮内辣椒素模型进行药理学研究的可行性。