Forester Gerald L, Thoms Peg, Pinto Jeffrey K
AMEC, Tucker, Georgia, USA.
Psychol Rep. 2007 Feb;100(1):270-4. doi: 10.2466/pr0.100.1.270-274.
This research investigated goal setting on engineering teams with geographically dispersed members. A survey was designed to measure the Quality of Goal Setting, Goal Commitment, Perceived Task Outcomes, and Perceived Psychosocial Outcomes, all constructs and scales used in previous research on project teams. 82 respondents from 12 virtual teams participated. Analysis suggested the quality of goal setting affected Perceived Task Outcome (t = 2.40, p < .05) but not Perceived Psychosocial Outcomes. Further regression analysis indicated goal commitment predicted significant variance in both Perceived Task Outcomes (t = 2.35, p < .05) and Perceived Psychosocial Outcomes (t = 4.3, p < .01). These results suggest that setting high quality goals and building commitment to goals significantly affect perceptions of outcomes on virtual project teams.
本研究调查了成员地理分布分散的工程团队中的目标设定情况。设计了一项调查来衡量目标设定质量、目标承诺、感知任务成果和感知社会心理成果,这些都是先前关于项目团队的研究中使用的所有构念和量表。来自12个虚拟团队的82名受访者参与了调查。分析表明,目标设定质量影响了感知任务成果(t = 2.40,p < .05),但不影响感知社会心理成果。进一步的回归分析表明,目标承诺在感知任务成果(t = 2.35,p < .05)和感知社会心理成果(t = 4.3,p < .01)方面都预测了显著的方差。这些结果表明,设定高质量的目标并建立对目标的承诺会显著影响虚拟项目团队对成果的认知。