• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过组合任务角色分配和目标结构策略来弥合团队断层线。

Bridging team faultlines by combining task role assignment and goal structure strategies.

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2012 Mar;97(2):407-20. doi: 10.1037/a0025231. Epub 2011 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1037/a0025231
PMID:21875173
Abstract

This study tests whether the detrimental effects of strong diversity faultlines on team performance can be counteracted by combining 2 managerial strategies: task role crosscutting and superordinate goals. We conducted a 2 (crosscut vs. aligned roles) × 2 (superordinate vs. subgroup goals) experimental study. Seventy-two 4-person teams with faultlines stemming from gender and educational major performed a complex decision-making task. The results show that teams with crosscut roles perform better when they are assigned a superordinate goal than a subgroup goal, whereas teams with aligned roles are not affected by goal manipulations. This effect is mediated by elaboration of task-relevant information. Implications for theory and management of team faultlines are discussed.

摘要

本研究旨在检验通过结合两种管理策略(任务角色交叉和至上目标)是否可以抵消强多样性断层线对团队绩效的不利影响。我们进行了一项 2(交叉角色与一致角色)×2(至上目标与小组目标)的实验研究。72 个由性别和教育专业差异产生的断层线的 4 人团队完成了一项复杂的决策任务。结果表明,当分配至上目标而非小组目标时,具有交叉角色的团队表现更好,而具有一致角色的团队不受目标操纵的影响。这种效果是通过对任务相关信息的详细阐述来实现的。讨论了对团队断层线的理论和管理的启示。

相似文献

1
Bridging team faultlines by combining task role assignment and goal structure strategies.通过组合任务角色分配和目标结构策略来弥合团队断层线。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Mar;97(2):407-20. doi: 10.1037/a0025231. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
2
A multilevel model of minority opinion expression and team decision-making effectiveness.多元层次模型视角下的少数派意见表达与团队决策有效性。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Sep;95(5):824-33. doi: 10.1037/a0019939.
3
Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: is activation the key?揭开性别断层线对团队创造力的影响:激活是关键吗?
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Jan;93(1):225-34. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.225.
4
When goal orientations collide: effects of learning and performance orientation on team adaptability in response to workload imbalance.当目标取向冲突时:学习和绩效取向对团队应对工作量不平衡的适应性的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Sep;95(5):935-43. doi: 10.1037/a0019637.
5
Examining the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups: a categorization-elaboration approach.考察群体中目标分歧的非对称效应:分类-细化方法。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Nov;98(6):948-61. doi: 10.1037/a0033725. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
6
Fuse or fracture? Threat as a moderator of the effects of diversity faultlines in teams.融合还是破裂?威胁作为团队多样性断层线效应的调节因素。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Sep;102(9):1344-1359. doi: 10.1037/apl0000231. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
7
The effects of alignments: examining group faultlines, organizational cultures, and performance.排列的效果:考察群体断裂带、组织文化和绩效。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Jan;97(1):77-92. doi: 10.1037/a0023684. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
8
The power of "we": effects of psychological collectivism on team performance over time.“我们”的力量:心理集体主义对团队绩效的时间效应。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Mar;96(2):247-62. doi: 10.1037/a0020929.
9
[The role of self-guided training in the relationship between task conflict and innovation in virtual teams].[自我引导式培训在虚拟团队任务冲突与创新关系中的作用]
Psicothema. 2012 Feb;24(1):29-34.
10
Effectiveness in top management group meetings: the role of goal clarity, focused communication, and learning behavior.高层管理团队会议的有效性:目标明确、聚焦沟通和学习行为的作用。
Scand J Psychol. 2010 Jun 1;51(3):253-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00769.x. Epub 2010 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual characteristics on multicultural team performance: does the role played by leaders and team members matter?多元文化团队绩效中的个体特征:领导者和团队成员所扮演的角色重要吗?
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 19;14:1281422. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1281422. eCollection 2023.
2
CEO-TMT overseas experience differences and firm performance: A self-categorization theory perspective.首席执行官-高层管理团队海外经历差异与企业绩效:自我分类理论视角
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 1;9(7):e17845. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17845. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
The teams of early-career investigators: A qualitative pilot study.
早期职业研究人员团队:一项定性试点研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Oct;2(5):321-326. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.335.