Sculean Anton, Pietruska Malgorzata, Arweiler Nicole B, Auschill Thorsten M, Nemcovsky Carlos
Department of Periodontology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Jun;34(6):507-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01084.x. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
To evaluate the 4-year results following regenerative periodontal surgery at intra-bony defects with either a combination of an enamel matrix protein derivative (EMD) and a bioactive glass (BG) or with EMD alone.
Twenty-five patients with one deep intra-bony defect each were randomly treated with either an EMD+BG (test) or with EMD alone (control). Measurements were recorded at baseline, at 1 and at 4 years following therapy. The primary outcome variable was the clinical attachment level (CAL).
The test group demonstrated a mean CAL change from 10.3+/-1.6 to 6.7+/-1.2 mm (p<0.001) and to 6.9+/-1.0 mm (p<0.001) at 1 and 4 years, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the 1- and 4-year results. The control group showed a mean CAL change from 10.4+/-1.6 to 6.7+/-1.1 mm (p<0.001) at 1 year and 7.0+/-0.9 mm (p<0.001) at 4 years. The CAL change between 1 and 4 years did not present statistically significant differences. In each of the two groups, four defects have lost 1 mm of the CAL gained at 1 year. A CAL gain of 1 mm compared with the 1-year results was measured in only one defect of the test group. Compared with baseline, a CAL gain of >/=3 mm was found at 4 years in 10 defects in both groups. Between the treatment groups, no statistically significant differences in any of the investigated parameters were observed at 1 and at 4 years.
Within their limits, the present results indicate that the clinical improvements obtained with both regenerative modalities can be maintained over a period of 4 years.
评估采用釉基质蛋白衍生物(EMD)与生物活性玻璃(BG)联合或单独使用EMD治疗骨内缺损的牙周再生手术4年的效果。
25例患者,每人有一处深部骨内缺损,随机分为EMD+BG治疗组(试验组)或单独使用EMD治疗组(对照组)。在治疗前基线、治疗后1年和4年进行测量记录。主要观察指标为临床附着水平(CAL)。
试验组在1年和4年时CAL平均变化分别从10.3±1.6降至6.7±1.2mm(p<0.001)和6.9±1.0mm(p<0.001)。1年和4年的结果之间未发现统计学显著差异。对照组在1年时CAL平均变化从10.4±1.6降至6.7±1.1mm(p<0.001),在4年时降至7.0±0.9mm(p<0.001)。1年至4年的CAL变化无统计学显著差异。两组中各有4处缺损在1年时获得的CAL丧失了1mm。试验组仅1处缺损在4年时与1年结果相比CAL增加了1mm。与基线相比,两组在4年时有10处缺损CAL增加≥3mm。在治疗组之间,1年和4年时所研究的任何参数均未观察到统计学显著差异。
在其局限性范围内,目前的结果表明,两种再生治疗方式所获得的临床改善在4年期间均可维持。