Suppr超能文献

一项比较螺旋连接技术与普尔弗塔夫编织法用于肌腱修复的体外生物力学研究。

An in vitro biomechanical study comparing the spiral linking technique against the pulvertaft weave for tendon repair.

作者信息

Kulikov Y I, Dodd S, Gheduzzi S, Miles A W, Giddins G E B

机构信息

Warwick Orthopaedics, Warwick Medical School, UK.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007 Aug;32(4):377-81. doi: 10.1016/J.JHSB.2007.02.009. Epub 2007 Apr 23.

Abstract

A new spiral linking technique for tendon repair in which one end of the tendon is spiralled around the other end has been developed. Using pig trotter extensor tendons, the Pulvertaft weave technique was compared with this new technique. Twenty-five repairs using each technique were tested by tensile loading with an Instron testing machine. The spiral linking technique matched the strength of Pulvertaft method: the mean peak loads were 102 and 105 N, respectively. The Pulvertaft weave was stiffer than the spiral linking technique: mean stiffness of 11.1 and 6.7 N/mm, respectively. The spiral linking technique also absorbed considerably more energy: energy absorbed prior to failure to 90% of peak load, 1.75 and 1.13 kN mm, respectively. In conclusion, the spiral linking technique appears as strong as the Pulvertaft weave and we believe it is easier to perform.

摘要

一种用于肌腱修复的新型螺旋连接技术已经研发出来,该技术是将肌腱的一端围绕另一端螺旋缠绕。使用猪蹄伸肌腱,将普尔弗塔夫编织技术与这种新技术进行了比较。每种技术进行的25例修复均通过英斯特朗试验机进行拉伸加载测试。螺旋连接技术的强度与普尔弗塔夫方法相当:平均峰值载荷分别为102 N和105 N。普尔弗塔夫编织比螺旋连接技术更硬:平均刚度分别为11.1 N/mm和6.7 N/mm。螺旋连接技术吸收的能量也明显更多:在达到峰值载荷的90%之前吸收的能量分别为1.75 kN·mm和1.13 kN·mm。总之,螺旋连接技术似乎与普尔弗塔夫编织一样坚固,并且我们认为它更容易操作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验