Vincken Nanette L A, Lauwers Thomas M A S, van der Hulst Rene R W J
Maastricht UMC+, The Netherlands.
Hand (N Y). 2017 Jan;12(1):78-84. doi: 10.1177/1558944716646758. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
In this study, biomechanical strength and bulkiness of the cow-hitch technique and Pulvertaft weave were compared. Our goal was to investigate whether the cow hitch can withstand equal strength in comparison with the Pulvertaft and to see if there is a difference in bulk, which could enhance gliding function and reduce friction and adhesion formation. Sheep tendons were used to perform 10 cow-hitch and 10 Pulvertaft repairs. Tensile strength was obtained with a cyclic loading tensile testing machine and tendon width and height measurements were obtained through digital analysis by photographs of the repairs. The cow hitch showed significantly better ultimate strength and had less bulk. There was no statistical difference in displacement, defined as gain in total length of the tendon. The results in this study show that the cow hitch outperforms the Pulvertaft weave in both ultimate strength and bulk.
在本研究中,对牛结技术和普尔弗塔夫编织法的生物力学强度及粗壮程度进行了比较。我们的目标是研究牛结与普尔弗塔夫编织法相比是否能承受同等强度,以及观察在粗壮程度上是否存在差异,这种差异可能会增强滑动功能并减少摩擦和粘连形成。使用羊肌腱进行了10次牛结修复和10次普尔弗塔夫编织法修复。通过循环加载拉伸试验机获得拉伸强度,并通过对修复部位照片进行数字分析获得肌腱宽度和高度测量值。牛结显示出明显更好的极限强度且更细。在定义为肌腱总长度增加量的位移方面没有统计学差异。本研究结果表明,牛结在极限强度和粗壮程度方面均优于普尔弗塔夫编织法。