Carnaghi A, Cadinu M, Castelli L, Kiesner J, Bragantini C
University of Padova (DPSS), Padova, Italy.
AIDS Care. 2007 Mar;19(3):432-40. doi: 10.1080/09540120600582013.
The present study addressed how individuals in high versus low need for cognition react to a persuasive message (concerning safer sexual conduct) presented either in a written format or in a comic-strip format. A control group that did not receive any persuasive message was also included. With reference to the Theory of Reasoned Action, we analyzed participants' instrumental attitude and instrumental norm toward the use of condoms. Results indicated that, compared to participants in the control group, providing participants with the persuasive message bolstered their instrumental attitude and norm. More importantly, participants high in need for cognition displayed higher levels of both instrumental attitude and norm when the message was in a written, as compared to a comic-strip, format. In contrast, participants low in need for cognition reported a stronger level of both instrumental attitude and norm in reaction to a comic-strip than a written message. Results are discussed with respect to their theoretical and practical implications.
本研究探讨了高认知需求者与低认知需求者如何应对以书面形式或连环漫画形式呈现的说服性信息(关于更安全性行为)。还纳入了一个未收到任何说服性信息的对照组。参照理性行动理论,我们分析了参与者对使用避孕套的工具性态度和工具性规范。结果表明,与对照组的参与者相比,向参与者提供说服性信息增强了他们的工具性态度和规范。更重要的是,当信息以书面形式而非连环漫画形式呈现时,高认知需求的参与者表现出更高水平的工具性态度和规范。相比之下,低认知需求的参与者对连环漫画的反应所报告的工具性态度和规范水平比书面信息更强。讨论了结果在理论和实践方面的意义。