Suppr超能文献

胰岛素抵抗作为冠状动脉疾病血管造影严重程度和范围的预测指标。

Insulin resistance as predictor of the angiographic severity and extent of coronary artery disease.

作者信息

Granér Marit, Syvänne Mikko, Kahri Juhani, Nieminen Markku S, Taskinen Marja-Riitta

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Ann Med. 2007;39(2):137-44. doi: 10.1080/07853890601083451.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Insulin resistance (IR) is frequently observed in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Aim. To examine the association between IR and severity and extent of CAD.

METHODS

Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was used to assess coronary atherosclerosis in 107 patients with clinically suspected CAD. QCA-derived indexes reflecting CAD severity, extent, and overall atheroma burden were calculated for the entire coronary tree, and separately for different coronary segments. IR was quantified using the homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA IR). Nondiabetic subjects (n = 83) were divided into group 1 (n = 41) with HOMA IR <1.8 (the median value), and group 2 (n = 42) with HOMA IR >or=1.8. Group 3 comprised diabetic subjects (n = 24).

RESULTS

Global age- and gender-adjusted indexes for severity (P = 0.007), extent (P = 0.038), and atheroma burden (P = 0.035) of CAD were higher in group 2 than in group 1. Similarly, the global severity (P = 0.027), extent (P = 0.090), and global atheroma burden (P = 0.024) indexes were higher in group 3 compared with group 1. IR was correlated with quantitative angiographic indexes for distal segments only, but not for proximal or mid segments of coronary vessels.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with more severe degree of IR have a more severe, extensive, and distal type of CAD than patients with lower degree of IR.

摘要

背景

冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中经常观察到胰岛素抵抗(IR)。目的:研究IR与CAD严重程度及范围之间的关联。

方法

采用定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)评估107例临床疑似CAD患者的冠状动脉粥样硬化情况。计算反映CAD严重程度、范围及总体动脉粥样硬化负荷的QCA衍生指标,分别针对整个冠状动脉树以及不同冠状动脉节段进行计算。使用稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)对IR进行量化。非糖尿病受试者(n = 83)被分为两组,第1组(n = 41)HOMA-IR <1.8(中位数),第2组(n = 42)HOMA-IR≥1.8。第3组为糖尿病受试者(n = 24)。

结果

第2组CAD严重程度(P = 0.007)、范围(P = 0.038)和动脉粥样硬化负荷(P = 0.035)的总体年龄和性别调整指数高于第1组。同样,第3组与第1组相比,总体严重程度(P = 0.027)、范围(P = 0.090)和总体动脉粥样硬化负荷(P = 0.024)指数更高。IR仅与冠状动脉远端节段的定量血管造影指标相关,而与冠状动脉近端或中段无关。

结论

与IR程度较低的患者相比,IR程度较高的患者CAD更严重、范围更广且为远端型。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验