Engholm Gerda, Kejs Anne Mette T, Brewster David H, Gaard Maria, Holmberg Lars, Hartley Roger, Iddenden Robert, Møller Henrik, Sankila Risto, Thomson Catherine S, Storm Hans H
Department of Cancer Prevention and Documentation, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Int J Cancer. 2007 Sep 1;121(5):1115-22. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22737.
A deficit in colorectal cancer survival in Denmark and in the UK compared to Sweden, Norway and Finland was found in the EUROCARE studies. We set out to explore if these differences still exist. Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer as their first invasive cancer at age 15-89 in the period 1994-2000 were identified using data from 11 cancer registries in the UK and from four Nordic countries. Five-year relative period survival using deaths in 1999-2000 following cancers diagnosed in 1994-2000 was analysed with excess mortality risk modelling. Follow-up time since diagnosis with age as an effect-modifier in the first half year was the most important factor with the highest excess risk of death immediately after diagnosis and with higher age and decreasing with length of follow-up. Variations between countries were bigger in the first half year following diagnosis than in the interval 0.5-5 years with about 30% higher risk in UK and Denmark. The differences between countries are still substantial and the order has not changed, even if the five year relative survival has improved since the EUROCARE studies. Patient management, diagnostics, and comorbidity likely explain the excess deaths in UK and Denmark during the first 6 months. The effect of stage and quality of management and treatment should be examined in population based studies with detailed patient information. Use of more detailed age-intervals than conventionally applied in survival studies proved to be important in statistical modelling and is recommended for future studies.
欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EUROCARE)的研究发现,与瑞典、挪威和芬兰相比,丹麦和英国的结直肠癌患者生存率较低。我们着手探究这些差异是否依然存在。利用英国11个癌症登记处以及四个北欧国家的数据,确定了1994年至2000年期间15至89岁首次被诊断为浸润性结直肠癌的患者。采用超额死亡风险模型分析了1994年至2000年确诊癌症后,1999年至2000年期间死亡患者的五年相对期生存率。诊断后的随访时间以年龄作为上半年的效应修饰因子,是最重要的因素,诊断后即刻死亡的超额风险最高,且随年龄增长而增加,随随访时间延长而降低。诊断后上半年各国之间的差异比0.5至5年期间更大,英国和丹麦的风险高出约30%。即使自欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EUROCARE)研究以来五年相对生存率有所提高,各国之间的差异仍然很大,且顺序未变。患者管理、诊断和合并症可能解释了英国和丹麦在头6个月内的超额死亡情况。应在基于人群的研究中,结合详细的患者信息,研究分期以及管理和治疗质量的影响。在生存研究中,使用比传统应用更详细的年龄区间在统计建模中被证明是重要的,建议未来的研究采用。