Suppr超能文献

[纳米沉淀法制备两种载亲脂性抗癌草药药物的聚乳酸纳米粒的比较]

[Comparison of preparing two polylactide nanoparticles loaded lipophilic anti-cancer herb drug by nanoprecipitation method].

作者信息

Zhang Ji-Fen, Hou Shi-Xiang, Liu Hui-Lian

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2007 Feb;32(4):303-6.

Abstract

This paper introduced an experimental study of polylacticacid (PLA) nanoparticles of lipophilic anti-cancer herb drug using a precipitation method. Cucurbitacins (Cu) and Curcuminoids (Cur) were selected to be model drugs. They had similar solubility but their incorporation effects were significantly different: the average drug entrapment ratio, the average drug loading and the average drug recovery were 38.53%, 2.21% and 27.02% respectively; while those of Cur-PLA-NP were 94.36%, 14.35% and 91.23% respectively. To analyse the reason, drug incorporation process was investigated. By measuring solvent evaporation rate, ratio of drug PLA precipitates, drug distribution in system and entrapping ratio at different time of preparation, we found the difference of precipitation velocity of drug was the main reason. We also concluded that not all lipophilic drug can be well entrapped into PLA nanoparticle by nanoprecipitation method. The drug incorporation depended on the interations among drug, PLA and organic solvents, in addition to the solubility of the drug.

摘要

本文介绍了采用沉淀法对亲脂性抗癌草药药物聚乳酸(PLA)纳米颗粒进行的实验研究。选择葫芦素(Cu)和姜黄素(Cur)作为模型药物。它们具有相似的溶解度,但它们的包封效果却有显著差异:平均药物包封率、平均载药量和平均药物回收率分别为38.53%、2.21%和27.02%;而Cur-PLA-NP的相应数值分别为94.36%、14.35%和91.23%。为分析原因,对药物包封过程进行了研究。通过测量溶剂蒸发速率、药物-PLA沉淀物的比例、体系中药物的分布以及制备不同时间的包封率,我们发现药物沉淀速度的差异是主要原因。我们还得出结论,并非所有亲脂性药物都能通过纳米沉淀法很好地包封到PLA纳米颗粒中。药物包封除了取决于药物的溶解度外,还取决于药物、PLA和有机溶剂之间的相互作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验