Annakkaya All Nihat, Arbak Peri, Balbay Oner, Bilgin Cahit, Erbas Mete, Bulut Ismet
Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Duzce, Turkey.
Tumori. 2007 Jan-Feb;93(1):61-7. doi: 10.1177/030089160709300111.
To evaluate the relationship between delayed diagnosis and the degree of invasion and survival in lung cancer.
One hundred and three patients (96 men) with lung cancer were included. Stages in the diagnosis of lung cancer were classified as follows: symptom-to-doctor interval, i.e., the interval from the first symptoms related to the presence of lung cancer to the first consultation with a medical professional; doctor-to-diagnosis interval, i.e., the interval between the first medical visit and confirmation of the diagnosis; and diagnosis-to-treatment interval, i.e., the interval between diagnosis and complete TNM staging and treatment. The symptom-to-treatment interval (STI) was the sum of the 3 intervals. The degree of invasion was determined by the TNM classification.
The patients were followed up for a mean period (= SD) of 7.4+/-8.7 months. Seventy-six (74%) patients were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 27 patients (26%) with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The mean length of STI was 120+/-101 days (median, 90). The mean length of the symptom-to-doctor interval was 63+/-62 days (median, 45), while the doctor-to-diagnosis and diagnosis-to-treatment intervals were 41 +/-82 days (median, 10) and 16+/-12 days (median, 12), respectively. When the STIs of the patients were correlated with tumor stage, tumor invasion, lymph node involvement and metastasis, no significant differences were found. Patients with an STI longer than 60 days had a significantly longer survival. Regarding the type of lung cancer and STI, the median survival was shorter in patients with an STI of less than 60 days both in NSCLC and SCLC, although this was not statistically significant in SCLC.
The shorter the diagnostic interval, the shorter was the median survival in our study. The reason for the apparent discrepancy between poor prognosis of lung cancer patients in spite of early diagnosis might be much faster progression of the disease itself.
评估肺癌延迟诊断与侵袭程度及生存之间的关系。
纳入103例肺癌患者(96例男性)。肺癌诊断阶段分类如下:症状至医生间隔,即从与肺癌存在相关的首发症状到首次咨询医疗专业人员的间隔;医生至诊断间隔,即首次就诊与确诊之间的间隔;以及诊断至治疗间隔,即诊断与完成TNM分期及治疗之间的间隔。症状至治疗间隔(STI)为这3个间隔之和。侵袭程度由TNM分类确定。
患者平均随访时间(=标准差)为7.4±8.7个月。76例(74%)患者诊断为非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),27例(26%)患者诊断为小细胞肺癌(SCLC)。STI的平均长度为120±101天(中位数,90天)。症状至医生间隔的平均长度为63±62天(中位数,45天),而医生至诊断间隔和诊断至治疗间隔分别为41±82天(中位数,10天)和16±12天(中位数,12天)。当患者的STI与肿瘤分期、肿瘤侵袭、淋巴结受累及转移相关时,未发现显著差异。STI超过60天的患者生存时间显著更长。关于肺癌类型与STI,NSCLC和SCLC中STI少于60天的患者中位生存时间均较短,尽管在SCLC中这无统计学意义。
在我们的研究中,诊断间隔越短,中位生存时间越短。尽管早期诊断,但肺癌患者预后较差这一明显差异的原因可能是疾病本身进展快得多。