Chandra Subhash, Mohan Anant, Guleria Randeep, Singh Vikas, Yadav Piush
Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009 Jul-Sep;10(3):453-6.
The majority of lung cancers are diagnosed and treated at an advanced stage. This may, in part, be due to a long lag period between the onset of symptoms, achieving a diagnosis and initiation of treatment. This lag period is highly variable in the limited studies conducted till date and dependent on several modifiable and non-modifiable factors. This study was conducted to determine the average time period required at various steps for diagnosing lung cancer from the onset of symptoms at a tertiary referral centre in Northern India.
Newly diagnosed, histologically proven cases of lung cancer were studied during the period of 2002-08. The delay was calculated as: (a) symptom-to-diagnosis delay, between the onset of symptoms to confirmed diagnosis; (b) diagnosis-to-treatment delay, between diagnosis and treatment started; (c) symptom-to-treatment delay, between onset of symptoms and treatment.
Out of 165 patients studied (139 males, mean -/+ SD age, 57.6 -/+ 8.9 years; 26 females, 53.5 -/+11.1 years; 84.9% smokers with mean -/+ SD smoking pack-years of 37 -/+ 27.3, 86.7% non small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) and 13.3% small cell lung cancers (SCLC)). At the time of diagnosis, 90.2% of NSCLC patients had stage IIIB or IV disease, while 81.8% of SCLC patients had extensive metastasis. A total of 28 (17%) patients had received antitubercular treatment (ATT) since onset of current symptoms. The median symptom-to-diagnosis delay, diagnosis-to-treatment delay, and symptom-to-treatment delay was 143 days (range, 4 to 721), 20 days (range, 1 to 380) and 185 days (18 to 870) respectively. Delay in diagnosis was significantly higher in patients who had received ATT initially (mean difference 65.5 days, 95% confidence interval of difference, 24.5 to 106.6; p=0.002). Patients with higher KPS score had shorter symptom to diagnosis delay (p=0.075).
In comparison with studies from European countries, there is an unacceptable longer lag period from symptom onset to initiation of treatment in Indian patients with lung cancer. Inappropriate treatment with ATT significantly prolongs this delay. These delays need to be shortened to the minimum possible in order to improve prognosis.
大多数肺癌在晚期才被诊断和治疗。这在一定程度上可能是由于从症状出现到确诊及开始治疗之间存在较长的延迟期。在迄今为止进行的有限研究中,这个延迟期差异很大,并且取决于几个可改变和不可改变的因素。本研究旨在确定在印度北部一家三级转诊中心,从症状出现到诊断肺癌的各个步骤所需的平均时间。
对2002年至2008年期间新诊断的、经组织学证实的肺癌病例进行研究。延迟时间计算如下:(a)症状到诊断的延迟,即从症状出现到确诊之间的时间;(b)诊断到治疗的延迟,即从诊断到开始治疗之间的时间;(c)症状到治疗的延迟,即从症状出现到治疗之间的时间。
在研究的165例患者中(139例男性,平均年龄±标准差为57.6±8.9岁;26例女性,53.5±11.1岁;84.9%为吸烟者,平均吸烟包年数±标准差为37±27.3,86.7%为非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),13.3%为小细胞肺癌(SCLC))。在诊断时,90.2%的NSCLC患者处于IIIB期或IV期疾病,而81.8%的SCLC患者有广泛转移。自当前症状出现以来,共有28例(17%)患者接受了抗结核治疗(ATT)。症状到诊断的延迟、诊断到治疗的延迟和症状到治疗的延迟的中位数分别为143天(范围为4至721天)、20天(范围为1至380天)和185天(18至870天)。最初接受ATT治疗的患者诊断延迟明显更高(平均差异65.5天,差异的95%置信区间为24.5至106.6;p = 0.002)。KPS评分较高的患者症状到诊断的延迟较短(p = 0.075)。
与欧洲国家的研究相比,印度肺癌患者从症状出现到开始治疗的延迟期长得令人无法接受。不适当的ATT治疗显著延长了这一延迟。为了改善预后,需要将这些延迟尽可能缩短到最低限度。