Bachert C, Vestenbaek U, Christensen J, Griffiths U K, Poulsen P B
Upper Airway Research Laboratory (URL), ENT Department, University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2007 May;37(5):772-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02706.x.
The prevalence of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis has increased dramatically. Seventeen million people in the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland suffer from grass pollen induced allergic rhinitis. Symptomatic therapy with antihistamines and topical steroids is partially effective but allergen-specific immunotherapy by injection or sublingual routes is superior. The grass allergen tablet (GRAZAX) is a new allergen-specific immunotherapy for home administration.
To assess the cost-effectiveness of the grass allergen tablet compared with symptomatic medication in seven Northern European countries.
A prospective pharmacoeconomic analysis was carried out alongside a multinational clinical trial. Pooled data on resource use and health outcomes were collected. A societal perspective was adopted, and the analysis had a 9-year time horizon. The outcome measure was Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs).
The grass allergen tablet was clinically superior to symptomatic treatment, producing statistically significant differences for all efficacy end-points, including the number of QALYs gained - 0.976 vs. 0.947 QALYs gained. There was a significantly higher usage of the rescue medications loratadine and budesonide, and more hours missed from work (production loss), in the symptomatic treatment group. The cost per QALY gained in the grass allergen tablet group was similar in the seven countries (euro 12,930 to euro 18,263 for an annual cost of the grass allergen tablet of euro 1500). The analysis showed that the grass allergen tablet was cost-effective for all countries for an annual treatment cost below euro 2200.
The pharmacoeconomic analysis illustrated that allergen-specific immunotherapy with the grass allergen tablet is a cost-effective intervention for the prevention of grass pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis in Northern European countries, for a tablet price below euro 6. In Germany for example the price of the tablet is euro 2.95 corresponding to a yearly treatment cost of euro 358 - based on a 9-year time horizon.
变应性鼻结膜炎的患病率急剧上升。在英国、德国、荷兰、瑞典、丹麦、挪威和芬兰,有1700万人患有草花粉诱发的变应性鼻炎。使用抗组胺药和局部用类固醇进行对症治疗有一定效果,但注射或舌下途径的变应原特异性免疫疗法效果更佳。草过敏原片剂(GRAZAX)是一种可在家中使用的新型变应原特异性免疫疗法。
评估在七个北欧国家中,草过敏原片剂与对症药物相比的成本效益。
在一项多国临床试验的同时进行了前瞻性药物经济学分析。收集了资源使用和健康结果的汇总数据。采用社会视角,分析的时间跨度为9年。结果指标为质量调整生命年(QALYs)。
草过敏原片剂在临床上优于对症治疗,在所有疗效终点上均产生了统计学上的显著差异,包括获得的QALYs数量——分别为0.976和0.947 QALYs。对症治疗组中,急救药物氯雷他定和布地奈德的使用量显著更高,误工时间(生产损失)更多。草过敏原片剂组中每获得一个QALY的成本在七个国家中相似(草过敏原片剂年成本为1500欧元时,每QALY成本为12,930欧元至18,263欧元)。分析表明,对于年治疗成本低于2200欧元的情况,草过敏原片剂在所有国家均具有成本效益。
药物经济学分析表明,对于北欧国家预防草花粉诱发的鼻结膜炎而言,草过敏原片剂进行变应原特异性免疫疗法是一种具有成本效益的干预措施,片剂价格低于6欧元。例如在德国,该片剂价格为2.95欧元,基于9年的时间跨度,年治疗成本为358欧元。