• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高治疗率对皮下免疫治疗(SCIT)在呼吸道过敏中的成本效益影响:决策分析建模方法。

Impact of increasing treatment rates on cost-effectiveness of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) in respiratory allergy: a decision analytic modelling approach.

机构信息

Institute for Health Care Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany.

Centre for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1229-1242. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0970-6. Epub 2018 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-018-0970-6
PMID:29574666
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Specific immunotherapy is the only causal treatment in respiratory allergy. Due to high treatment cost and possible severe side effects subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is not indicated in all patients. Nevertheless, reported treatment rates seem to be low. This study aims to analyze the effects of increasing treatment rates of SCIT in respiratory allergy in terms of costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

METHODS

A state-transition Markov model simulates the course of disease of patients with allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma and both diseases over 10 years including a symptom-free state and death. Treatment comprises symptomatic pharmacotherapy alone or combined with SCIT. The model compares two strategies of increased and status quo treatment rates. Transition probabilities are based on routine data. Costs are calculated from the societal perspective applying German unit costs to literature-derived resource consumption. QALYs are determined by translating the mean change in non-preference-based quality of life scores to a change in utility. Key parameters are subjected to deterministic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Increasing treatment rates is a cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 3484€/QALY compared to the status quo. The most influential parameters are SCIT discontinuation rates, treatment effects on the transition probabilities and cost of SCIT. Across all parameter variations, the best case leads to dominance of increased treatment rates while the worst case ICER is 34,315€/QALY. Excluding indirect cost leads to a twofold increase in the ICER.

CONCLUSIONS

Measures to increase SCIT initiation rates should be implemented and also address improving adherence.

摘要

背景

特异性免疫疗法是呼吸道过敏的唯一因果疗法。由于治疗费用高,且可能出现严重副作用,皮下免疫疗法(SCIT)并非所有患者都适用。然而,报告的治疗率似乎很低。本研究旨在分析提高呼吸道过敏 SCIT 治疗率对成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs)的影响。

方法

状态转移马尔可夫模型模拟了 10 年中过敏性鼻炎、过敏性哮喘和两种疾病患者的疾病过程,包括无症状状态和死亡。治疗包括单独对症药物治疗或与 SCIT 联合治疗。该模型比较了增加和现状治疗率的两种策略。转移概率基于常规数据。成本从社会角度计算,采用德国单位成本计算文献中资源消耗的成本。QALYs 通过将非偏好基础生活质量评分的平均变化转化为效用变化来确定。关键参数进行了确定性敏感性分析。

结果

提高治疗率是一种具有成本效益的策略,与现状相比,增量成本效益比(ICER)为 3484 欧元/QALY。最具影响力的参数是 SCIT 停药率、治疗对转移概率的影响和 SCIT 的成本。在所有参数变化中,最佳情况下,增加治疗率具有优势,而最差情况下的 ICER 为 34315 欧元/QALY。排除间接成本会使 ICER 增加一倍。

结论

应采取措施提高 SCIT 起始率,并解决提高依从性的问题。

相似文献

1
Impact of increasing treatment rates on cost-effectiveness of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) in respiratory allergy: a decision analytic modelling approach.提高治疗率对皮下免疫治疗(SCIT)在呼吸道过敏中的成本效益影响:决策分析建模方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1229-1242. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0970-6. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
2
Cost-effectiveness of specific subcutaneous immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma.特异性皮下免疫疗法在变应性鼻炎和变应性哮喘患者中的成本效益
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Sep;101(3):316-24. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60498-X.
3
Cost-effectiveness of grass pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) compared to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) and symptomatic treatment in Austria, Spain, and Switzerland.在奥地利、西班牙和瑞士,草花粉皮下免疫疗法(SCIT)与舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)及对症治疗相比的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2018 Apr;21(4):374-381. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1419959. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
4
A non-stationary Markov model for economic evaluation of grass pollen allergoid immunotherapy.用于草花粉变应原免疫治疗经济学评价的非平稳马尔可夫模型。
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0232753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232753. eCollection 2020.
5
The cost-effectiveness of immunotherapy for respiratory allergy: a review.免疫疗法治疗呼吸道过敏的成本效益:综述。
Allergy. 2012 Sep;67(9):1087-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2012.02861.x. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
6
Cost-minimization analysis of sublingual immunotherapy versus subcutaneous immunotherapy for house dust mite respiratory allergic disease in Denmark.丹麦针对屋尘螨呼吸道过敏性疾病的舌下免疫疗法与皮下免疫疗法的成本最小化分析。
J Med Econ. 2016 Aug;19(8):735-41. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1158718. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
7
Administration and Burden of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis in U.S. and Canadian Clinical Practice.美国和加拿大临床实践中变应性鼻炎皮下免疫治疗的管理和负担。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Nov;21(11):982-90. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.11.982.
8
Cost of subcutaneous immunotherapy in a large insured population in the United States.美国一个大型参保人群中皮下免疫疗法的成本。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Feb;35(2):351-358. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1510386. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
9
Subcutaneous specific immunotherapy: Economic implications from the perspective of statutory health insurance - a population based cost-effectiveness estimation.皮下特异性免疫疗法:法定健康保险视角下的经济影响——基于人群的成本效益评估。
Allergol Select. 2018 Sep 1;2(1):111-120. doi: 10.5414/ALX1507E. eCollection 2018.
10
A Cost-Minimisation Analysis Comparing Sublingual Immunotherapy to Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for the Treatment of House Dust Mite Allergy in a Swedish Setting.在瑞典环境下比较舌下免疫疗法与皮下免疫疗法治疗屋尘螨过敏的成本最小化分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Jun;37(6):541-549. doi: 10.1007/s40261-017-0516-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of house dust mite subcutaneous immunotherapy in real-life. Immunological and clinical biomarkers and economic impact analysis.屋尘螨皮下免疫疗法在实际应用中的效果。免疫和临床生物标志物及经济影响分析。
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Jun 15;16(6):100789. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100789. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Guideline on allergen immunotherapy in IgE-mediated allergic diseases: S2K Guideline of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), Society of Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), Austrian Society of Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), Swiss Society for Allergology and Immunology (SSAI), German Dermatological Society (DDG), German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), Society of Pediatric Pulmonology (GPP), German Respiratory Society (DGP), German Professional Association of Otolaryngologists (BVHNO), German Association of Paediatric and Adolescent Care Specialists (BVKJ), Federal Association of Pneumologists, Sleep and Respiratory Physicians (BdP), Professional Association of German Dermatologists (BVDD).IgE介导的过敏性疾病变应原免疫治疗指南:德国变态反应与临床免疫学会(DGAKI)、儿科变态反应与环境医学学会(GPA)、德国变态反应学家医学协会(AeDA)、奥地利变态反应与免疫学会(ÖGAI)、瑞士变态反应与免疫学会(SSAI)、德国皮肤病学会(DDG)、德国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会(DGHNO-KHC)、德国儿科学与青少年医学学会(DGKJ)、儿科肺病学会(GPP)、德国呼吸学会(DGP)、德国耳鼻喉科医生专业协会(BVHNO)、德国儿科与青少年护理专家协会(BVKJ)、联邦肺病学家、睡眠与呼吸内科医生协会(BdP)、德国皮肤科医生专业协会(BVDD)的S2K指南

本文引用的文献

1
Course of respiratory allergy by treatment strategy based on German routine data.基于德国常规数据的治疗策略下呼吸道过敏的病程
Allergo J Int. 2017;26(6):195-203. doi: 10.1007/s40629-017-0027-x. Epub 2017 May 30.
2
Allergen immunotherapy for allergic asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.变应原免疫疗法治疗变应性哮喘:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Allergy. 2017 Dec;72(12):1825-1848. doi: 10.1111/all.13208. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
3
Allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.变应性鼻炎结膜炎的变应原免疫治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Allergol Select. 2022 Sep 6;6:167-232. doi: 10.5414/ALX02331E. eCollection 2022.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Of The SQ Grass SLIT-Tablet In Children With Allergic Rhinitis: A German Payer Perspective.从德国医保支付方角度看,SQ草花粉舌下含片治疗儿童过敏性鼻炎的成本效益
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Nov 6;11:637-649. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S223383. eCollection 2019.
Allergy. 2017 Nov;72(11):1597-1631. doi: 10.1111/all.13201. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
4
Effect of 2 Years of Treatment With Sublingual Grass Pollen Immunotherapy on Nasal Response to Allergen Challenge at 3 Years Among Patients With Moderate to Severe Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis: The GRASS Randomized Clinical Trial.舌下草花粉免疫疗法治疗2年对中重度季节性过敏性鼻炎患者3年时鼻过敏原激发反应的影响:GRASS随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Feb 14;317(6):615-625. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.21040.
5
Sublingual Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis: Is 2-Year Treatment Sufficient for Long-term Benefit?舌下免疫疗法治疗变应性鼻炎:2年治疗对长期获益是否足够?
JAMA. 2017 Feb 14;317(6):591-593. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0128.
6
United airway disease: current perspectives.联合气道疾病:当前观点
J Asthma Allergy. 2016 May 11;9:93-100. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S81541. eCollection 2016.
7
Systematic overview of cost-effectiveness thresholds in ten countries across four continents.四大洲十个国家成本效益阈值的系统综述。
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Sep;4(5):485-504. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.38.
8
Patient selection for subcutaneous versus sublingual immunotherapy.皮下免疫疗法与舌下免疫疗法的患者选择
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Dec;15(6):588-95. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000219.
9
Guideline on allergen-specific immunotherapy in IgE-mediated allergic diseases: S2k Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Society for Pediatric Allergy and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the Austrian Society for Allergy and Immunology (ÖGAI), the Swiss Society for Allergy and Immunology (SGAI), the German Society of Dermatology (DDG), the German Society of Oto- Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), the German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), the Society for Pediatric Pneumology (GPP), the German Respiratory Society (DGP), the German Association of ENT Surgeons (BV-HNO), the Professional Federation of Paediatricians and Youth Doctors (BVKJ), the Federal Association of Pulmonologists (BDP) and the German Dermatologists Association (BVDD).IgE介导的过敏性疾病中变应原特异性免疫治疗指南:德国变态反应学与临床免疫学会(DGAKI)、儿科变态反应与环境医学学会(GPA)、德国变态反应科医生医学协会(AeDA)、奥地利变态反应与免疫学会(ÖGAI)、瑞士变态反应与免疫学会(SGAI)、德国皮肤病学会(DDG)、德国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会(DGHNO-KHC)、德国儿科学与青少年医学学会(DGKJ)、儿科肺病学会(GPP)、德国呼吸学会(DGP)、德国耳鼻喉外科医生协会(BV-HNO)、儿科医生与青年医生专业联合会(BVKJ)、肺科医生联邦协会(BDP)以及德国皮肤科医生协会(BVDD)的S2k指南
Allergo J Int. 2014;23(8):282-319. doi: 10.1007/s40629-014-0032-2.
10
Comparing and explaining differences in the magnitude, content, and sensitivity of utilities predicted by the EQ-5D, SF-6D, HUI 3, 15D, QWB, and AQoL-8D multiattribute utility instruments.比较并解释由EQ-5D、SF-6D、HUI 3、15D、QWB和AQoL-8D多属性效用工具预测的效用在大小、内容和敏感性方面的差异。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Apr;35(3):276-91. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14543107. Epub 2014 Aug 26.