• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[指南背景下“共识”的含义——问题介绍]

[The meaning of 'consensus' in the context of guidelines--an introduction into the problem].

作者信息

Köbberling Johannes

机构信息

Innere Klinik des Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Klinikums, Wuppertal.

出版信息

Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2007;101(2):85-7. doi: 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.01.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.01.001
PMID:17458352
Abstract

From the point of view of sociology a consensus may be incompatible with science. This also applies to consensus statements developed by a scientific medical society, since a lack of facts might have been replaced by a majority decision. This is in contrast to the idea of evidence-based medicine (EbM). Personal beliefs do not gain more plausibility (a higher level of evidence) by the mere fact that they are supported by a majority. Thus it is not helpful to demand that EbM-oriented guidelines also be consensus-based.

摘要

从社会学的角度来看,达成共识可能与科学不相容。这也适用于科学医学协会制定的共识声明,因为缺乏事实依据可能已被多数人的决定所取代。这与循证医学(EbM)的理念形成对比。个人信念不会仅仅因为得到多数人的支持就更具可信度(更高的证据水平)。因此,要求以循证医学为导向的指南也以共识为基础并无益处。

相似文献

1
[The meaning of 'consensus' in the context of guidelines--an introduction into the problem].[指南背景下“共识”的含义——问题介绍]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2007;101(2):85-7. doi: 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.01.001.
2
Consensus statements, evidence-based medicine and guidelines in allergic diseases.过敏性疾病的共识声明、循证医学与指南
Allergy. 2008 Jan;63(1):1-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01594.x.
3
UK policy statements on testosterone deficiency.英国关于睾酮缺乏的政策声明。
Int J Clin Pract. 2017 Mar;71(3-4). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12901. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
4
Serving the clinician and the patient: three ways that quality clinical guidelines can build on expert consensus statements and systematic reviews.服务临床医生和患者:高质量临床指南基于专家共识声明和系统评价的三种方式。
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Apr;51(7):557-558. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096241. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
5
Consistent Definitions of Clinical Practice Guidelines, Consensus Statements, Position Statements, and Practice Alerts.临床实践指南、共识声明、立场声明和实践警报的一致定义。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Dec;129(6):1767-1770. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004236.
6
Guideline panels should not GRADE good practice statements.指南小组不应使用GRADE系统对良好实践声明进行分级。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 May;68(5):597-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.011. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
7
Quality of professional society guidelines and consensus conference statements in critical care.重症监护领域专业学会指南及共识会议声明的质量
Crit Care Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):1049-58. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31816a01ec.
8
Evidence-based guidelines and consensus statements.基于证据的指南和共识声明。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Aug;95(8):843-4. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12940.
9
[Methodological standards of the evidence-based approach of clinical guidelines development in Germany. Consensus between the scientific community, self-governed bodies and practice].[德国临床指南制定循证方法的方法学标准。科学界、自治机构与实践之间的共识]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Jun;94(5):330-9.
10
In the current era of evidence-based guidelines, do consensus-based guidelines still have a place?在当前基于证据的指南时代,基于共识的指南是否仍有一席之地?
Occup Med (Lond). 2005 Aug;55(5):343-4. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqi095.