Levsky Marc E, Rosin Alex, Coon Troy P, Enslow William L, Miller Michael A
Department of Emergency Medicine, C. R. Damall Army Medical Center, Fort Hood, TX 76544, USA.
South Med J. 2007 Apr;100(4):371-5. doi: 10.1097/01.smj.0000257537.51929.4b.
The emphasis on publications for promotion in academic medicine would lead one to the theory that authorship numbers would increase proportionally with this emphasis. To investigate authorship trends across a number of periodicals, we performed a descriptive study comparing two full years of published articles spaced ten years apart from five medical journals.
Physician reviewers each reviewed all articles of one medical journal for the 1995 and 2005 publication years. Reviewed journals included Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM), Annals of Emergency Medicine (AnnEM), Annals of Internal Medicine (AIM), Journal of Trauma (JT), and New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). Data collected for each article were number of authors, ordinal number of the corresponding author, type of study described, whether the described study was a multicenter trial, whether authorship listed included a "study group," and whether any author was also an editor of the journal.
A total of 2927 articles were published in the five journals in 1995, and of these, 1401 (47.9%) were analyzed after the exclusion criteria had been applied; for 2005 a total of 3630 articles were published and of these, 1351 (37.2%) were included in the analysis. Across all five journals the mean number of authors per article increased from 4.66 to 5.73 between 1995 and 2005 (P < 0.0001), and four of the five journals individually had statistically significant increases in the number of authors per article. More articles had a journal editor as an author in 2005 (increased from 7.8% to 11.0%, P = 0.004), though no single journal had a statistically significant increase.
We describe a trend of increasing mean authors, editorial authorship, study groups, and multicenter trials over time with fewer solo authors now publishing original research or case reports. The academic medical community must pursue an authorship requirement consensus to assure that a standard of contribution for all authors on a given paper is met.
学术医学领域对发表论文以获得晋升的重视会让人得出这样一种理论,即作者数量会随着这种重视程度成比例增加。为了研究众多期刊上的作者署名趋势,我们进行了一项描述性研究,比较了五份医学期刊中相隔十年的两个完整年份发表的文章。
医师评审员分别评审了一份医学期刊在1995年和2005年发表的所有文章。所评审的期刊包括《学术急诊医学》(AEM)、《急诊医学年鉴》(AnnEM)、《内科学年鉴》(AIM)、《创伤杂志》(JT)和《新英格兰医学杂志》(NEJM)。为每篇文章收集的数据包括作者数量、通讯作者的序号、所描述研究的类型、所描述的研究是否为多中心试验、署名中是否包括“研究小组”以及是否有作者同时也是该期刊的编辑。
1995年这五份期刊共发表了2927篇文章,其中1401篇(47.9%)在应用排除标准后进行了分析;2005年共发表了3630篇文章,其中1351篇(37.2%)纳入了分析。在所有五份期刊中,1995年至2005年间每篇文章的平均作者数量从4.66增加到了5.73(P < 0.0001),五份期刊中有四份期刊每篇文章的作者数量有统计学意义的增加。2005年有更多文章的作者中有期刊编辑(从7.8%增至11.0%,P = 0.004),不过没有一份期刊有统计学意义的增加。
我们描述了一种随着时间推移平均作者数量、编辑作者身份、研究小组和多中心试验增加的趋势,现在发表原创研究或病例报告的独立作者减少。学术医学界必须寻求作者署名要求的共识,以确保给定论文的所有作者都达到贡献标准。