Albani J R
Laboratoire de Biophysique Moléculaire, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, Bâtiment C6, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cédex, France.
J Fluoresc. 2007 Jul;17(4):406-17. doi: 10.1007/s10895-007-0183-3. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
Origin of tryptophan fluorescence is still up to these days a quiz which is not completely solved. Fluorescence emission properties of tryptophan within proteins are in general considered as the result of fluorophore interaction within its environment. For example, a low fluorescence quantum yield is supposed to be the consequence of an important fluorophore-environment interaction. However, are we sure that the fluorophore has been excited upon light absorption? What if fluorophore excitation did not occur as the result of internal conformation specific to the fluorophore environment? Are we sure that all absorbed energy is used for the excitation process? Fluorescence lifetimes of Trp residues are considered to originate from rotamers or conformers resulting from the rotation of the indole ring within the peptide bonds. However, how can we explain the fact that in most of the proteins, the two lifetimes 0.5 and 3 ns, attributed to the conformers, are also observed for free tryptophan in solution? The present work, performed on free tryptophan and tyrosine in solution and on different proteins, shows that absorption and excitation spectra overlap but their intensities at the different excitation wavelengths are not necessarily equal. Also, we found that fluorescence emission intensities recorded at different excitation wavelengths depend on the intensities at these excitation wavelengths and not on the optical densities. Thus, excitation is not equal to absorption. In our interpretation of the data, we consider that absorbed photons are not necessary used only for the excitation, part of them are used to reorganize fluorophore molecules in a new state (excited structure) and another part is used for the excitation process. A new parameter that characterizes the ratio of the number of emitted photons over the real number of photons used to excite the fluorophore can be defined. We call this parameter, the emission to excitation ratio. Since our results were observed for fluorophores free in solution and present within proteins, structural reorganization does not depend on the protein backbone. Thus, fluorescence lifetimes (0.5 and 3 ns) observed for tryptophan molecules result from the new structures obtained in the excited state. Our theory allows opening a new way in the understanding of the origin of protein fluorescence and fluorescence of aromatic amino acids.
时至今日,色氨酸荧光的起源仍是一个尚未完全解决的谜题。蛋白质中色氨酸的荧光发射特性通常被认为是荧光团与其环境相互作用的结果。例如,低荧光量子产率被认为是重要的荧光团 - 环境相互作用的结果。然而,我们如何确定荧光团在光吸收时被激发了呢?如果荧光团的激发并非由于荧光团环境特有的内部构象而发生呢?我们如何确定所有吸收的能量都用于激发过程呢?色氨酸残基的荧光寿命被认为源于肽键中吲哚环旋转产生的旋转异构体或构象异构体。然而,我们如何解释在大多数蛋白质中,归因于构象异构体的0.5纳秒和3纳秒这两种寿命,在溶液中的游离色氨酸中也能观察到这一事实呢?目前针对溶液中的游离色氨酸和酪氨酸以及不同蛋白质所开展的研究表明,吸收光谱和激发光谱相互重叠,但它们在不同激发波长下的强度不一定相等。此外我们发现,在不同激发波长下记录的荧光发射强度取决于这些激发波长下的强度,而非光密度。因此,激发并不等同于吸收。在我们对数据的解释中,我们认为吸收的光子不一定仅用于激发,其中一部分用于将荧光团分子重新组织成新的状态(激发态结构),另一部分用于激发过程。可以定义一个新参数,该参数表征发射光子数与用于激发荧光团的实际光子数之比。我们将这个参数称为发射与激发比。由于我们在溶液中游离的荧光团以及蛋白质中存在的荧光团上都观察到了这些结果,所以结构重组并不依赖于蛋白质主链。因此,色氨酸分子观察到的荧光寿命(0.5纳秒和3纳秒)是由激发态中获得的新结构导致的。我们的理论为理解蛋白质荧光和芳香族氨基酸荧光的起源开辟了一条新途径。