Ash Joan S, Sittig Dean F, Poon Eric G, Guappone Kenneth, Campbell Emily, Dykstra Richard H
Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97201-3098, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(4):415-23. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2373. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems can help hospitals improve health care quality, but they can also introduce new problems. The extent to which hospitals experience unintended consequences of CPOE, which include more than errors, has not been quantified in prior research.
To discover the extent and importance of unintended adverse consequences related to CPOE implementation in U.S. hospitals.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Building on a prior qualitative study involving fieldwork at five hospitals, we developed and then administered a telephone survey concerning the extent and importance of CPOE-related unintended adverse consequences to representatives from 176 hospitals in the U.S. that have CPOE.
Self report by key informants of the extent and level of importance to the overall function of the hospital of eight types of unintended adverse consequences experienced by sites with inpatient CPOE. RESULTS We found that hospitals experienced all eight types of unintended adverse consequences, although respondents identified several they considered more important than others. Those related to new work/more work, workflow, system demands, communication, emotions, and dependence on the technology were ranked as most severe, with at least 72% of respondents ranking them as moderately to very important. Hospital representatives are less sure about shifts in the power structure and CPOE as a new source of errors. There is no relation between kinds of unintended consequences and number of years CPOE has been used. Despite the relatively short length of time most hospitals have had CPOE (median five years), it is highly infused, or embedded, within work practice at most of these sites.
The unintended consequences of CPOE are widespread and important to those knowledgeable about CPOE in hospitals. They can be positive, negative, or both, depending on one's perspective, and they continue to exist over the duration of use. Aggressive detection and management of adverse unintended consequences is vital for CPOE success.
计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)系统有助于医院提高医疗质量,但也可能引发新问题。此前研究尚未对医院经历的CPOE意外后果(其中包含多种情况,不仅仅是差错)的程度进行量化。
探究美国医院实施CPOE过程中意外不良后果的程度及重要性。
设计、地点与参与者:基于此前一项涉及对五家医院进行实地调研的定性研究,我们设计并开展了一项电话调查,询问美国176家已采用CPOE的医院的代表CPOE相关意外不良后果的程度及重要性。
关键信息提供者自报住院患者CPOE实施点所经历的八种意外不良后果对医院整体功能的影响程度及重要性水平。结果我们发现,医院经历了所有八种意外不良后果,尽管受访者指出其中几种他们认为比其他后果更重要。那些与新工作/更多工作、工作流程、系统要求、沟通、情绪以及对技术的依赖相关的后果被列为最严重,至少72%的受访者将其评为中等至非常重要。医院代表对权力结构的变化以及CPOE作为新的差错来源不太确定。意外后果的种类与CPOE使用年限之间没有关联。尽管大多数医院使用CPOE的时间相对较短(中位数为五年),但在这些医院中的大多数,CPOE已高度融入工作实践。
CPOE的意外后果广泛存在,对于医院中了解CPOE的人来说很重要。根据不同人的观点,这些后果可能是积极的、消极的或两者皆有,并且在使用期间持续存在。积极发现和管理不良意外后果对于CPOE的成功至关重要。