Suppr超能文献

美国急症护理医院基于计算机的医嘱录入系统输注水平调查。

A survey of U.S.A. acute care hospitals' computer-based provider order entry system infusion levels.

作者信息

Sittig Dean F, Guappone Ken, Campbell Emily M, Dykstra Richard H, Ash Joan S

机构信息

Northwest Permanente, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):252-6.

Abstract

We developed and fielded a survey to help clinical information system designers, developers, and implementers better understand the infusion level, or the extent and sophistication of CPOE feature availability and use by clinicians within acute care hospitals across the United States of America. In the 176 responding hospitals, we found that CPOE had been in place a median of 5 years and that the median percentage of orders entered electronically was 90.5%. Greater than 96% of the sites used CPOE to enter pharmacy, laboratory and imaging orders; 82% were able to access all aspects of the clinical information system with a single sign-on; 86% of the respondents had order sets, drug-drug interaction warnings, and pop-up alerts even though nearly all hospitals were community hospitals with commercial systems; and 90% had a CPOE committee with a clinician representative in place. While CPOE has not been widely adopted after over 30 years of experimentation, there is still much that can be learned from this relatively small number of highly infused (with CPOE and clinical decision support) organizations.

摘要

我们开发并开展了一项调查,以帮助临床信息系统的设计者、开发者和实施者更好地了解美国急性护理医院中临床医生使用计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)功能的程度,即CPOE功能的可用范围和复杂程度。在176家回复调查的医院中,我们发现CPOE的使用时间中位数为5年,电子录入医嘱的中位数百分比为90.5%。超过96%的机构使用CPOE录入药房、实验室和影像检查医嘱;82%的机构能够通过单点登录访问临床信息系统的所有方面;86%的受访者拥有医嘱模板、药物相互作用警告和弹出式警报,尽管几乎所有医院都是配备商业系统的社区医院;90%的医院设有由临床医生代表组成的CPOE委员会。尽管经过30多年的试验,CPOE尚未得到广泛应用,但仍能从这相对少数的高渗透率(具备CPOE和临床决策支持)组织中学到很多东西。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验