Eslami Saeid, Abu-Hanna Ameen, de Keizer Nicolette F
Academic Medical Center, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Department of Medical Informatics, J1b-124, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(4):400-6. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2238. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
This paper provides a systematic literature review of CPOE evaluation studies in the outpatient setting on: safety; cost and efficiency; adherence to guideline; alerts; time; and satisfaction, usage, and usability. Thirty articles with original data (randomized clinical trial, non-randomized clinical trial, or observational study designs) met the inclusion criteria. Only four studies assessed the effect of CPOE on safety. The effect was not significant on the number of adverse drug events. Only one study showed a significant reduction of the number of medication errors. Three studies showed significant reductions in medication costs; five other studies could not support this. Most studies on adherence to guidelines showed a significant positive effect. The relatively small number of evaluation studies published to date do not provide adequate evidence that CPOE systems enhance safety and reduce cost in the outpatient settings. There is however evidence for (a) increasing adherence to guidelines, (b) increasing total prescribing time, and (c) high frequency of ignored alerts.
本文对门诊环境下计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)评估研究进行了系统的文献综述,内容涉及:安全性;成本与效率;指南依从性;警示;时间;以及满意度、使用率和易用性。30篇包含原始数据的文章(随机临床试验、非随机临床试验或观察性研究设计)符合纳入标准。仅有四项研究评估了CPOE对安全性的影响。对药物不良事件数量的影响不显著。仅有一项研究显示用药错误数量显著减少。三项研究显示用药成本显著降低;其他五项研究未能证实这一点。大多数关于指南依从性的研究显示出显著的积极效果。迄今为止发表的评估研究数量相对较少,没有提供充分证据表明CPOE系统可提高门诊环境下的安全性并降低成本。然而,有证据表明:(a)提高指南依从性;(b)增加总开方时间;(c)警示被忽略的频率较高。