• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊处方专家系统医生使用情况的决定因素

Determinants of physician use of an ambulatory prescription expert system.

作者信息

Schectman Joel M, Schorling John B, Nadkarni Mohan M, Voss John D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 800744, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2005 Sep;74(9):711-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.05.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.05.011
PMID:15985385
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether physician experience with and attitude towards computers is associated with adoption of a voluntary ambulatory prescription writing expert system.

METHODS

A prescription expert system was implemented in an academic internal medicine residency training clinic and physician utilization was tracked electronically. A physician attitude and behavior survey (response rate=89%) was conducted six months after implementation.

RESULTS

There was wide variability in system adoption and degree of usage, though 72% of physicians reported predominant usage (> or =50% of prescriptions) of the expert system six months after implementation. Self-reported and measured technology usage were strongly correlated (r=0.70, p<0.0001). Variation in use was strongly associated with physician attitude toward issues of system efficiency and effect on quality, but not with prior computer experience, level of training, or satisfaction with their primary care practice. Non-adopters felt that electronic prescribing was more time consuming and also more likely to believe that their patients preferred hand-written prescriptions.

CONCLUSION

A voluntary electronic prescription system was readily adopted by a majority of physicians who believed it would have a positive impact on the quality and efficiency of care. However, dissatisfaction with system capabilities among both adopters and non-adopters suggests the importance of user education and expectation management following system selection.

摘要

目的

确定医生对计算机的经验和态度是否与采用自愿性门诊处方书写专家系统相关。

方法

在一家学术性内科住院医师培训诊所实施了一个处方专家系统,并通过电子方式跟踪医生的使用情况。在实施六个月后进行了一项医生态度和行为调查(回复率=89%)。

结果

系统采用率和使用程度存在很大差异,不过在实施六个月后,72%的医生报告主要使用(≥50%的处方)专家系统。自我报告的技术使用情况与实际测量的情况高度相关(r=0.70,p<0.0001)。使用差异与医生对系统效率问题和对质量影响的态度密切相关,但与先前的计算机经验、培训水平或对其初级保健实践的满意度无关。未采用者认为电子处方更耗时,也更有可能认为他们的患者更喜欢手写处方。

结论

大多数认为自愿性电子处方系统会对医疗质量和效率产生积极影响的医生很容易采用该系统。然而,采用者和未采用者对系统功能的不满表明,在系统选择后进行用户教育和期望管理很重要。

相似文献

1
Determinants of physician use of an ambulatory prescription expert system.门诊处方专家系统医生使用情况的决定因素
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Sep;74(9):711-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.05.011.
2
Factors influencing physician use of clinical electronic information technologies after adoption by their medical group practices.医疗集团采用临床电子信息技术后影响医生使用该技术的因素。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2008 Oct-Dec;33(4):361-7. doi: 10.1097/01.HCM.0000318773.67395.ce.
3
Physician productivity and the ambulatory EHR in a large academic multi-specialty physician group.在一个大型学术多专科医师集团中,医生的生产力和门诊电子病历。
Int J Med Inform. 2010 Jul;79(7):492-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.04.006. Epub 2010 May 15.
4
The Office of the Future Project: the integration of new technology into office practice. Academic detailing through the super highway. Quebec Research Group on Medication Use in the Elderly.未来办公项目办公室:新技术融入办公实践。通过超级高速公路进行学术推广。魁北克老年人用药研究小组。
Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1997 Apr-Jun;5(2):104-8.
5
Is physician adherence to prescription guidelines a general trait of health care practices or dependent on drug type?--a multilevel logistic regression analysis in South Sweden.医生对处方指南的遵循是医疗实践的普遍特征还是取决于药物类型?——瑞典南部的一项多层次逻辑回归分析
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Aug;18(8):682-90. doi: 10.1002/pds.1767.
6
Prescribing trends by nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the United States.美国执业护士和医师助理的处方开具趋势。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2006 Jun;18(6):291-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00133.x.
7
Physician perspectives on a pilot prescription monitoring program.医生对一项试点处方监测计划的看法。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2005;19(3):5-13.
8
Patterns and changes in prescriber attitudes toward PDA prescription-assistive technology.开处方者对个人数字助理处方辅助技术的态度模式及变化。
Int J Med Inform. 2009 May;78(5):330-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
9
Facilitating adherence to the tobacco use treatment guideline with computer-mediated decision support systems: physician and clinic office manager perspectives.利用计算机辅助决策支持系统促进对烟草使用治疗指南的依从性:医生和诊所办公室经理的观点
Prev Med. 2005 Aug;41(2):479-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.11.026.
10
The role of information technology usage in physician practice satisfaction.信息技术使用在医师执业满意度中的作用。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Oct-Dec;34(4):364-71. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181a90d53.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators of health professionals in adopting digital health-related tools for medication appropriateness: A systematic review.医疗专业人员采用数字健康相关工具促进用药合理性的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述。
Digit Health. 2024 Jan 17;10:20552076231225133. doi: 10.1177/20552076231225133. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Physicians' Use of the Computerized Physician Order Entry System for Medication Prescribing: Systematic Review.医生使用计算机化医嘱录入系统开具药物处方:系统评价。
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 4;9(3):e22923. doi: 10.2196/22923.
3
Main Elements of National Model of Electronic Prescription System from Physicians' Point of View: A Case Study in a Developing Country.
从医生角度看国家电子处方系统模型的主要要素:以一个发展中国家为例的研究
Iran J Pharm Res. 2019 Fall;18(4):2204-2215. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2019.1100801.
4
A Copmarative Review of Electronic Prescription Systems: Lessons Learned from Developed Countries.电子处方系统的比较性综述:从发达国家汲取的经验教训。 需注意,原文中“Copmarative”拼写错误,正确应为“Comparative” 。
J Res Pharm Pract. 2017 Jan-Mar;6(1):3-11. doi: 10.4103/2279-042X.200993.
5
Adoption of e-health technology by physicians: a scoping review.医生对电子健康技术的采用:一项范围界定综述。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 Aug 1;9:335-44. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S103881. eCollection 2016.
6
Evaluating the Impact of Computerized Provider Order Entry on Medical Students Training at Bedside: A Randomized Controlled Trial.评估计算机化医嘱录入对医学生床边培训的影响:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0138094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138094. eCollection 2015.
7
A Framework for Usable and Effective Clinical Decision Support: Experience from the iCPR Randomized Clinical Trial.一个实用且有效的临床决策支持框架:来自iCPR随机临床试验的经验。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015 Jul 9;3(2):1150. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1150. eCollection 2015.
8
Making pharmacogenomic-based prescribing alerts more effective: A scenario-based pilot study with physicians.提高基于药物基因组学的处方警示的有效性:一项针对医生的基于情景的试点研究。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Jun;55:249-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 May 7.
9
Physician Attitudes toward Adopting Genome-Guided Prescribing through Clinical Decision Support.临床决策支持下,医生对采用基于基因组学的处方的态度。
J Pers Med. 2014 Feb 27;4(1):35-49. doi: 10.3390/jpm4010035.
10
Factors of accepting pain management decision support systems by nurse anesthetists.护士麻醉师接受疼痛管理决策支持系统的因素。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Jan 29;13:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-16.