Suppr超能文献

对乙酰氨基酚对华法林治疗稳定患者国际标准化比值的影响。

The effect of acetaminophen on the international normalized ratio in patients stabilized on warfarin therapy.

作者信息

Parra David, Beckey Nick P, Stevens Gary R

机构信息

Section of Clinical Pharmacy, Patient Support Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Palm Beach, Florida 33410-6400, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2007 May;27(5):675-83. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.5.675.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an interaction exists between acetaminophen and warfarin that alters the international normalized ratio (INR).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Anticoagulation clinic at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

PATIENTS

Thirty-six adult patients receiving warfarin with stable INRs, defined as two consecutive INRs at least 3 weeks apart that were within the therapeutic range.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomly assigned to receive acetaminophen 1 g twice/day along with matching placebo twice/day (12 patients), acetaminophen 1 g 4 times/day (12 patients), or matching placebo 4 times/day (12 patients) for 4 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary end point was the difference in mean INR between groups at weekly intervals. Secondary end points were the percentages of patients in each group with supratherapeutic (INR > or = 0.3 above the upper limit of their therapeutic range) or subtherapeutic (INR > or = 0.2 or 0.3 below the lower limit of their respective therapeutic range of 2.0-3.0 or 2.5-3.5) INRs, and the difference in mean serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels between groups at biweekly intervals. Slow enrollment and a preliminary observation that 15 patients experienced an elevated INR prompted early termination of the study. At week 2, the group receiving acetaminophen 2 g/day had a significantly higher mean INR versus the placebo group (p=0.01). At weeks 1, 2, and 3, the acetaminophen 4-g/day group had significantly higher mean INRs compared with those in the placebo group (p=0.04, p=0.01, p=0.01, respectively). In addition, 13 (54%) of 24 patients in the acetaminophen groups combined exceeded the upper limit of their therapeutic range by 0.3 or greater compared with only 2 (17%) of 12 patients in the placebo group. No statistically significant differences in serum ALT or AST levels between either acetaminophen group versus the placebo group were found at week 4; however, there was a statistically significant increase in mean ALT level at week 2 in the acetaminophen 4-g/day group versus the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the existence of a clinically significant interaction between warfarin and daily use of acetaminophen 2-4 g, necessitating close monitoring of patients who receive this drug combination. Whether this interaction occurs when acetaminophen is taken in lower doses or is used sporadically requires further study.

摘要

研究目的

确定对乙酰氨基酚与华法林之间是否存在相互作用,从而改变国际标准化比值(INR)。

设计

前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

地点

一家退伍军人事务医疗中心的抗凝门诊。

患者

36名接受华法林治疗且INR稳定的成年患者,稳定INR定义为至少间隔3周的两个连续INR处于治疗范围内。

干预措施

患者被随机分配,分别接受每日两次每次1g对乙酰氨基酚及匹配安慰剂(12例患者)、每日4次每次1g对乙酰氨基酚(12例患者)或每日4次匹配安慰剂(12例患者),持续4周。

测量指标及主要结果

主要终点是各治疗组间每周平均INR的差值。次要终点是每组中INR高于治疗范围上限0.3或更多(超治疗范围)或低于各自治疗范围下限0.2或0.3(2.0 - 3.0或2.5 - 3.5)(亚治疗范围)的患者百分比,以及每两周各治疗组间血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)平均水平的差值。入组缓慢以及初步观察发现15例患者INR升高促使研究提前终止。在第2周,接受每日2g对乙酰氨基酚的组相比安慰剂组平均INR显著更高(p = 0.01)。在第1、2和3周,每日4g对乙酰氨基酚组相比安慰剂组平均INR显著更高(分别为p = 0.04、p = 0.01、p = 0.01)。此外,对乙酰氨基酚组24例患者中有13例(54%)超过其治疗范围上限0.3或更多,而安慰剂组12例患者中仅有2例(17%)。在第4周,对乙酰氨基酚组与安慰剂组之间血清ALT或AST水平无统计学显著差异;然而,在第2周,每日4g对乙酰氨基酚组相比安慰剂组平均ALT水平有统计学显著升高。

结论

这些发现支持华法林与每日使用2 - 4g对乙酰氨基酚之间存在具有临床意义的相互作用,这就需要对接受这种药物组合的患者进行密切监测。当对乙酰氨基酚以较低剂量服用或偶尔使用时是否会发生这种相互作用需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验