Netreba A I, Popov D V, Liubaeva E V, Bravyĭ Ia R, Prostova A B, Lemesheva Iu S, Vinogradova O L
Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova. 2007 Jan;93(1):27-38.
The effects of classical strength training (CT) and low intensity strength training without relaxation (TwR) upon size, strength and fatigability of leg muscles in men were compared. A 8-10-week strength training led to an increase of size and maximal voluntary contraction of trained muscles. After the CT, the increment of strength was higher; on the other hand, strength increments related to total work performed increased after the TwR noticeably higher than after the CT. Two training programs influenced the size of total muscle and of muscle fibers (MF) differently: the volume of m. quadriceps femoris increased more after the CT than after the TwR. The CT induced a significant increase of cross sectional area (CSA) of fast MF, and the TwR induced an increase of CSA of slow MF. Resistance to fatigue after the TwR was higher than after the. The effects of TwR were more pronounced in single-joint movements training than in multi-joint movement.
比较了经典力量训练（CT）和无放松的低强度力量训练（TwR）对男性腿部肌肉大小、力量和疲劳性的影响。为期8 - 10周的力量训练导致训练肌肉的大小和最大自主收缩增加。CT训练后，力量增加更高；另一方面，TwR训练后与总工作量相关的力量增加明显高于CT训练后。两种训练方案对总肌肉和肌纤维（MF）大小的影响不同：股四头肌的体积在CT训练后比TwR训练后增加更多。CT训练使快肌纤维的横截面积（CSA）显著增加，而TwR训练使慢肌纤维的CSA增加。TwR训练后的抗疲劳能力高于CT训练后。TwR训练在单关节运动训练中的效果比在多关节运动中更明显。
