Brévignon-Dodin Laure, Livesey Finbarr
Cambridge University, Centre for Economics and Policy, Institute for Manufacturing, Department of Engineering, Cambridge, UK.
Regen Med. 2006 Sep;1(5):709-14. doi: 10.2217/17460751.1.5.709.
The emergence of tissue-engineered products (TEPs) raises a standard question for regulators: is the existing regulatory regime appropriate or is there a case for a new regulatory framework? In the USA, the FDA has developed a risk-based approach to TEPs, whereas in Europe, a common regulatory strategy for these products has not yet been implemented. In order to fill this perceived gap, member states have set up domestic rules, which has led to an unclear and patchy regulatory situation. The Regulation on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products, voted on by the European Commission in November 2005, has been developed by European Union regulators to provide the necessary framework to regulate TEPs. As the text is still to be discussed and to be passed, many concerns have been raised regarding the appropriateness of the proposed framework.
组织工程产品(TEPs)的出现给监管机构提出了一个标准问题:现有的监管制度是否合适,还是有必要建立一个新的监管框架?在美国,食品药品监督管理局(FDA)已针对组织工程产品制定了基于风险的方法,而在欧洲,尚未实施针对这些产品的统一监管策略。为了填补这一明显的空白,各成员国制定了国内规则,这导致了监管情况不明确且零散。欧盟委员会于2005年11月投票通过的《先进治疗医药产品法规》,由欧盟监管机构制定,旨在提供监管组织工程产品所需的框架。由于该文本仍有待讨论和通过,人们对拟议框架的适用性提出了许多担忧。