Hoyer L W
Holland Laboratory, American Red Cross Blood Services, Rockville, Maryland.
Am J Med. 1991 Nov 4;91(5A):40S-44S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(91)80148-f.
Future progress in our ability to treat acquired factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors must be based on advances in knowledge of both the FVIII molecule and the nature of the human immune response. New therapeutic approaches to patients with acquired FVIII inhibition likely will emphasize modifications of the immune response. This concept holds considerable promise, because studies have characterized the critical steps leading to tolerance of self-antigens. Development of FVIII inhibitors represents a loss of self-tolerance, which any successful therapy must restore. Conceivably, restoration of self-tolerance can be accomplished in many ways: prevention of antigen binding to helper T lymphocytes, deletion of self-antigen-reactive T cells, inhibition of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) recognition, or enhancement of the antigen-specific suppressor T lymphocyte population. Recent data have demonstrated that highly specific methods can suppress ongoing immune responses against defined autoantigens. Antibodies that inhibit T-cell activation, peptides that block self-antigen binding, and antibodies that inhibit MHC recognition all have been successful in modifying experimentally induced autoimmune diseases. Whether any of these immunotherapeutic approaches will be effective in the treatment of acquired FVIII inhibition remains to be determined. Until data from animal model systems establish the feasibility of immune intervention, scrutiny of other new therapeutic approaches to patients with spontaneous inhibitors will continue to be important. Administration of FVIII-bypassing procoagulant proteins shows promise, as does removal of inhibitors by affinity reagents, such as FVIII peptides containing relevant epitopes (antigenic sites). Farther on the horizon is development of recombinant FVIII molecules so modified as to remove antigenic determinants while preserving procoagulant function. Articles in this supplement summarize several avenues for treatment of patients with acquired FVIII inhibitors. Alternatives include treatment with sufficient human or porcine FVIII to offset inhibitors, use of materials that reestablish hemostasis even though FVIII levels are not increased (the so-called FVIII-bypassing agents), manipulation of immune responses through physical depletion of inhibitor by plasmapheresis or affinity chromatography, and administration of intravenous immunoglobulin or immunosuppressive cytotoxic drugs. Thus, the heterogeneous clinical presentation is paralleled by the wide range of available therapeutic approaches.
我们在治疗获得性凝血因子VIII(FVIII)抑制物方面取得未来进展必须基于对FVIII分子和人类免疫反应本质的认识进步。针对获得性FVIII抑制的患者,新的治疗方法可能会强调对免疫反应的调节。这一概念具有很大的前景,因为研究已经明确了导致自身抗原耐受性的关键步骤。FVIII抑制物的产生代表了自身耐受性的丧失,任何成功的治疗都必须恢复这种耐受性。可以想象,恢复自身耐受性可以通过多种方式实现:防止抗原与辅助性T淋巴细胞结合、清除自身抗原反应性T细胞、抑制主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)识别或增强抗原特异性抑制性T淋巴细胞群体。最近的数据表明,高度特异性的方法可以抑制针对特定自身抗原的持续免疫反应。抑制T细胞活化的抗体、阻断自身抗原结合的肽以及抑制MHC识别的抗体在改变实验性诱导的自身免疫性疾病方面均已取得成功。这些免疫治疗方法是否对治疗获得性FVIII抑制有效仍有待确定。在动物模型系统的数据确定免疫干预的可行性之前,对自发性抑制物患者的其他新治疗方法进行仔细研究仍将很重要。给予绕过FVIII的促凝血蛋白显示出前景,通过亲和试剂(如含有相关表位(抗原位点)的FVIII肽)去除抑制物也有前景。更长远的是开发经过修饰以去除抗原决定簇同时保留促凝血功能的重组FVIII分子。本增刊中的文章总结了治疗获得性FVIII抑制物患者的几种途径。替代方法包括用足够的人或猪FVIII进行治疗以抵消抑制物、使用即使FVIII水平未升高也能重建止血的材料(所谓的FVIII旁路剂)、通过血浆置换或亲和层析物理清除抑制物来操纵免疫反应,以及给予静脉注射免疫球蛋白或免疫抑制性细胞毒性药物。因此,临床表现的异质性与可用治疗方法的广泛范围相对应。