Sijben John W C, Calder Philip C
Numico Research, Bosrandweg 20, 6704 PH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Proc Nutr Soc. 2007 May;66(2):237-59. doi: 10.1017/S0029665107005472.
The balance of intake of n-6 and n-3 PUFA, and consequently their relative incorporation into immune cells, is important in determining the development and severity of immune and inflammatory responses. Some disorders characterised by exaggerated inflammation and excessive formation of inflammatory markers have become among the most important causes of death and disability in man in modern societies. The recognition that long-chain n-3 PUFA have the potential to inhibit (excessive) inflammatory responses has led to a large number of clinical investigations with these fatty acids in inflammatory conditions as well as in healthy subjects. The present review explores the presence of dose-related effects of long-chain n-3 PUFA supplementation on immune markers and differences between healthy subjects and those with inflammatory conditions, because of the important implications for the transfer of information gained from studies with healthy subjects to patient populations, e.g. for establishing dose levels for specific applications. The effects of long-chain n-3 PUFA supplementation on ex vivo lymphocyte proliferation and cytokine production by lymphocytes and monocytes in healthy subjects have been studied in twenty-seven, twenty-five and forty-six treatment cohorts respectively, at intake levels ranging from 0.2 g EPA+DHA/d to 7.0 g EPA+DHA/d. Most studies, particularly those with the highest quality study design, have found no effects on these immune markers. Significant effects on lymphocyte proliferation are decreased responses in seven of eight cohorts, particularly in older subjects. The direction of the significant changes in cytokine production by lymphocytes is inconsistent and only found at supplementation levels > or =2.0 g EPA+DHA/d. Significant changes in inflammatory cytokine production by monocytes are decreases in their production in all instances. Overall, these studies fail to reveal strong dose-response effects of EPA+DHA on the outcomes measured and suggest that healthy subjects are relatively insensitive to immunomodulation with long-chain n-3 PUFA, even at intake levels that substantially raise their concentrations in phospholipids of immune cells. In patients with inflammatory conditions cytokine concentrations or production are influenced by EPA+DHA supplementation in a relatively large number of studies. Some of these studies suggest that local effects at the site of inflammation might be more pronounced than systemic effects and disease-related markers are more sensitive to the immunomodulatory effects, indicating that the presence of inflamed tissue or 'sensitised' immune cells in inflammatory disorders might increase sensitivity to the immunomodulatory effects of long-chain n-3 PUFA. In a substantial number of these studies clinical benefits related to the inflammatory state of the condition have been observed in the absence of significant effects on immune markers of inflammation. This finding suggests that condition-specific clinical end points might be more sensitive markers of modulation by EPA+DHA than cytokines. In general, the direction of immunomodulation in healthy subjects (if any) and in inflammatory conditions is the same, which indicates that studies in healthy subjects are a useful tool to describe the general principles of immunomodulation by n-3 PUFA. However, the extent of the effect might be very different in inflammatory conditions, indicating that studies in healthy subjects are not particularly suitable for establishing dose levels for specific applications in inflammatory conditions. The reviewed studies provide no indications that the immunomodulatory effects of long-chain n-3 PUFA impair immune function or infectious disease resistance. In contrast, in some conditions the immunomodulatory effects of EPA+DHA might improve immune function.
n-6和n-3多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFA)的摄入平衡,以及它们相对地掺入免疫细胞,对于决定免疫和炎症反应的发展及严重程度很重要。一些以炎症过度和炎症标志物过度形成为特征的疾病,已成为现代社会中人类死亡和残疾的最重要原因之一。认识到长链n-3 PUFA有可能抑制(过度的)炎症反应,已促使人们对这些脂肪酸在炎症状态以及健康受试者中进行了大量临床研究。本综述探讨长链n-3 PUFA补充剂对免疫标志物的剂量相关效应,以及健康受试者与炎症患者之间的差异,因为这对于将从健康受试者研究中获得的信息应用于患者群体具有重要意义,例如确定特定应用的剂量水平。分别在27个、25个和46个治疗队列中研究了长链n-3 PUFA补充剂对健康受试者体外淋巴细胞增殖以及淋巴细胞和单核细胞产生细胞因子的影响,摄入水平范围为0.2克二十碳五烯酸(EPA)+二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)/天至7.0克EPA+DHA/天。大多数研究,特别是那些具有最高质量研究设计的研究,未发现对这些免疫标志物有影响。对淋巴细胞增殖有显著影响的是八个队列中的七个队列反应降低,特别是在老年受试者中。淋巴细胞产生细胞因子的显著变化方向不一致,且仅在补充水平≥2.0克EPA+DHA/天时才出现。单核细胞产生炎症细胞因子的显著变化在所有情况下都是其产生减少。总体而言,这些研究未能揭示EPA+DHA对所测结果有强烈的剂量反应效应,并表明健康受试者对长链n-3 PUFA的免疫调节相对不敏感,即使在摄入水平显著提高其在免疫细胞磷脂中的浓度时也是如此。在大量炎症患者的研究中,EPA+DHA补充剂会影响细胞因子浓度或产生。其中一些研究表明,炎症部位的局部效应可能比全身效应更明显,且疾病相关标志物对免疫调节作用更敏感,这表明炎症性疾病中炎症组织或“致敏”免疫细胞的存在可能会增加对长链n-3 PUFA免疫调节作用的敏感性。在大量此类研究中,在对炎症免疫标志物无显著影响的情况下,已观察到与病情炎症状态相关的临床益处。这一发现表明,特定病情的临床终点可能比细胞因子更敏感地反映EPA+DHA的调节作用。一般来说,健康受试者(如果有)和炎症状态下免疫调节的方向是相同的,这表明对健康受试者的研究是描述n-3 PUFA免疫调节一般原则的有用工具。然而,在炎症状态下效应的程度可能非常不同,这表明对健康受试者的研究不太适合确定炎症状态下特定应用的剂量水平。所综述的研究没有表明长链n-3 PUFA的免疫调节作用会损害免疫功能或抗感染能力。相反,在某些情况下,EPA+DHA的免疫调节作用可能会改善免疫功能。