• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Flight decks and free flight: where are the system boundaries?

作者信息

Hollnagel Erik

机构信息

Industrial Safety Chair, Ecole des Mines de Paris-Pôle Cindyniques, Rue Claude Daunesse, B.P. 207, F-06904 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2007 Jul;38(4):409-16. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2007.01.010
PMID:17466254
Abstract

The change from managed to free flight is expected to have large effects, over and above the intended efficiency gains. Human factor concerns have understandably focused on how free flight may affect the pilots in the cockpit. Yet it is necessary to see the change from managed to free flight as more than just an increment to the pilots' work. Despite the best intentions the transition will not be a case of a smooth, carefully planned and therefore uneventful introduction of a new technology. It is more likely to be a substantial change to an already challenging working environment, in the air as well as on the ground. The significant effects will therefore not just happen within the existing structure or distribution of work and responsibilities, but affect the structure of work itself. This paper takes a look at free flight from a cognitive systems engineering perspective and identifies two major concerns: first what effects free flight has on the boundaries of the joint cognitive systems, and second how this affects demands to control. The conclusion is that both will change considerably and that we need to understand the nature of these changes before focusing on the possible effects of free flight on pilots' performance.

摘要

相似文献

1
Flight decks and free flight: where are the system boundaries?
Appl Ergon. 2007 Jul;38(4):409-16. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
2
Human factors evaluations of Free Flight Issues solved and issues remaining.对已解决和仍存在的自由飞行问题的人为因素评估。
Appl Ergon. 2007 Jul;38(4):437-55. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.01.006. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
3
Cockpit-cabin communication: II. Shall we tell the pilots?驾驶舱与客舱通信:II. 我们要告诉飞行员吗?
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1996;6(3):211-31. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0603_1.
4
Flight safety in Alaska: comparing attitudes and practices of high- and low-risk air carriers.阿拉斯加的飞行安全:比较高风险和低风险航空公司的态度与做法。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 Jan;76(1):52-7.
5
Cultural factors influencing safety need to be addressed in design and operation of technology.在技术的设计和运行中,需要考虑影响安全性的文化因素。
ICAO J. 1996 Oct;51(8):17-18, 27-28.
6
Perceived vs. measured effects of advanced cockpit systems on pilot workload and error: are pilots' beliefs misaligned with reality?先进驾驶舱系统对飞行员工作量和失误的感知影响与实测影响:飞行员的认知与现实是否脱节?
Appl Ergon. 2009 May;40(3):448-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
7
Human factors analysis of accidents involving visual flight rules flight into adverse weather.涉及按目视飞行规则飞入恶劣天气的事故的人为因素分析
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2002 Aug;73(8):817-22.
8
Teaming humans and automated systems in safely engineered environments.在安全设计的环境中将人类与自动化系统结合起来。
Life Support Biosph Sci. 1998;5(4):453-60.
9
U.S. Naval helicopter mishaps: cockpit egress problems.美国海军直升机事故:驾驶舱逃生问题。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1996 May;67(5):480-5.
10
Pilots' monitoring strategies and performance on automated flight decks: an empirical study combining behavioral and eye-tracking data.飞行员在自动化飞行甲板上的监测策略与表现:一项结合行为和眼动追踪数据的实证研究。
Hum Factors. 2007 Jun;49(3):347-57. doi: 10.1518/001872007X196685.