Suppr超能文献

肺癌根治性切除术后支气管残端的残留病灶。

Residual disease at the bronchial stump after curative resection for lung cancer.

作者信息

Wind Jan, Smit Egbert J, Senan Suresh, Eerenberg Jan-Peter

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Tergooiziekenhuis, Hilversum, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Jul;32(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.04.003. Epub 2007 Apr 27.

Abstract

The most important surgical goal during potentially curative surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a macroscopic and microscopic radical resection (R0-resection). Studies reporting on recurrence and long-term survival mainly comprise patients with completely resected NSCLC (R0-resection). However, there is limited data on incidence, treatment and prognosis of patients with microscopic residual tumour tissue at the bronchial resection margin (R1-resection). Furthermore, the definition of an R1-resection of the bronchial resection margin is not uniform in literature. Based on 19 studies published between 1945 and 2003 with a substantial number of included patients with resected NSCLC, the incidence of an R1-resection of the bronchial resection margin is approximately 4-5% (range 1.2-17%) of all lung resections. Divided into the localisation of the microscopic residual disease, survival of patients with carcinoma in situ (CIS) at the bronchial resection margin is comparable to the survival after a radical resection. The prognosis is negatively influenced in case of microscopic mucosal residual disease. Survival is even worse in patients with peribronchial residual disease; 1- and 5-year survivals range between 20-50% and 0-20%, respectively. This poor prognosis is because peribronchial residual disease, in 75-85% of the patients, is associated with mediastinal lymph node metastasis. According to the stage, survival of patients with stage I and II NSCLC and an R1-resection of the bronchial resection margin is significantly worse as compared to stage-corrected survival after a radical resection. In these patients, survival is limited due to local recurrence. The negative effect of an R1-resection of the bronchial margin in stage III NSCLC is limited, as these patients die due to disseminated disease (distant metastasis) before local recurrence occurs. A conservative approach with frequent bronchoscopic surveillance is justified for CIS. For patients with microscopic residual disease at the bronchial margin and stage I and II NSCLC, further treatment has to be considered. Adjuvant treatment in patients with stage III NSCLC has no proven benefit in terms of survival.

摘要

在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的潜在根治性手术中,最重要的手术目标是进行宏观和微观的根治性切除(R0切除)。报告复发和长期生存情况的研究主要包括完全切除NSCLC(R0切除)的患者。然而,关于支气管切缘存在微小残留肿瘤组织的患者(R1切除)的发病率、治疗和预后的数据有限。此外,文献中对支气管切缘R1切除的定义并不统一。基于1945年至2003年间发表的19项研究,纳入了大量接受NSCLC切除的患者,支气管切缘R1切除的发生率约为所有肺切除手术的4-5%(范围为1.2-17%)。根据微小残留病灶的定位划分,支气管切缘原位癌(CIS)患者的生存率与根治性切除后的生存率相当。若存在微小黏膜残留病灶,预后会受到负面影响。支气管周围残留病灶患者的生存率更差;1年和5年生存率分别在20-50%和0-20%之间。这种预后不良是因为在75-85%的患者中,支气管周围残留病灶与纵隔淋巴结转移相关。根据分期,I期和II期NSCLC且支气管切缘为R1切除的患者的生存率与根治性切除后的分期校正生存率相比明显更差。在这些患者中,生存受限于局部复发。支气管切缘R1切除对III期NSCLC的负面影响有限,因为这些患者在局部复发发生前就因播散性疾病(远处转移)死亡。对于CIS,采用频繁支气管镜监测的保守方法是合理的。对于支气管切缘存在微小残留病灶且为I期和II期NSCLC的患者,必须考虑进一步治疗。III期NSCLC患者的辅助治疗在生存方面未被证实有获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验