Suppr超能文献

爬楼梯能力是否是评估高危老年人腿部力量受损的临床相关指标?

Is stair climb power a clinically relevant measure of leg power impairments in at-risk older adults?

作者信息

Bean Jonathan F, Kiely Dan K, LaRose Sharon, Alian Joda, Frontera Walter R

机构信息

Department of PM&R, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 May;88(5):604-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the clinical relevance of the stair climb power test (SCPT) as a measure of leg power impairments in mobility-limited older adults.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from participants within a randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Rehabilitation research gym.

PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling older adults (N=138; mean age, 75.4 y) with mobility limitations as defined by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Leg power measures included the SCPT and double leg press power measured at 40% (DLP40) and 70% (DLP70) of the 1 repetition maximum. Mobility performance tests included the SPPB and its 3 components: gait speed, chair stand time, and standing balance.

RESULTS

Stair climb power per kilogram (SCP/kg) had correlations of moderate strength (r=.47, r=.52) with DLP40/kg and DLP70/kg, respectively. All 3 leg power measures correlated with each of the mobility performance measures with the exception of DLP40/kg (r=.11, P=.27) and DLP70/kg (r=.11, P=.18) with standing balance. Magnitudes of association, as described by the Pearson correlation coefficient, did not differ substantively among the separate power measures as they related to SPPB performance overall. Separate adjusted multivariate models evaluating the relationship between leg power and SPPB performance were all statistically significant and described equivalent amounts of the total variance (R(2)) in SPPB performance (SCP/kg, R(2)=.30; DLP40, R(2)=.32; DLP70, R(2)=.31). Analyses of the components of the SPPB show that the SCPT had stronger associations than the other leg power impairment measures with models predicting chair stand (SCP/kg, R(2)=.25; DLP40, R(2)=.12; DLP70, R(2)=.13), whereas both types of leg press power testing had stronger associations with models predicting gait speed (SCP/kg, R(2)=.16; DLP40, R(2)=.34; DLP70, R(2)=.34). Stair climb power was the only power measure that was a significant component of models predicting standing balance (SCP/kg R(2)=.20).

CONCLUSIONS

The SCPT is a clinically relevant measure of leg power impairments. It is associated with more complex modes of testing leg power impairments and is meaningfully associated with mobility performance, making it suitable for clinical settings in which impairment-mobility relationships are of interest.

摘要

目的

测试爬楼梯功率测试(SCPT)作为衡量行动受限老年人腿部力量受损情况的临床相关性。

设计

对一项随机对照试验中参与者的基线数据进行横断面分析。

设置

康复研究健身房。

参与者

根据简短体能测试电池组(SPPB)定义为行动受限的社区居住老年人(N = 138;平均年龄75.4岁)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要结局指标

腿部力量指标包括SCPT以及在1次重复最大值的40%(DLP40)和70%(DLP70)时测量的双腿推举力量。行动能力测试包括SPPB及其三个组成部分:步速、从椅子上站起的时间和站立平衡。

结果

每千克爬楼梯功率(SCP/kg)与DLP40/kg和DLP70/kg的相关性分别为中等强度(r = 0.47,r = 0.52)。所有三项腿部力量指标均与各项行动能力指标相关,但DLP40/kg(r = 0.11,P = 0.27)和DLP70/kg(r = 0.11,P = 0.18)与站立平衡指标除外。如Pearson相关系数所述,各单独力量指标与总体SPPB表现之间的关联程度在实质上并无差异。评估腿部力量与SPPB表现之间关系的单独调整多变量模型均具有统计学意义,并且在SPPB表现的总方差(R²)中解释的量相当(SCP/kg,R² = 0.30;DLP40,R² = 0.32;DLP70,R² = 0.31)。对SPPB各组成部分的分析表明,在预测从椅子上站起的模型中,SCPT的关联比其他腿部力量受损指标更强(SCP/kg,R² = 0.25;DLP40,R² = 0.12;DLP70,R² = 0.13),而两种类型的双腿推举力量测试在预测步速的模型中关联更强(SCP/kg,R² = 0.16;DLP40,R² = 0.34;DLP70,R² = 0.34)。爬楼梯功率是预测站立平衡模型中的唯一显著组成部分(SCP/kg R² = 0.20)。

结论

SCPT是衡量腿部力量受损情况的临床相关指标。它与测试腿部力量受损的更复杂模式相关,并且与行动能力表现有意义地相关,使其适用于关注受损 - 行动能力关系的临床环境。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验