Glasgow Russell E
Clinical Research Unit, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.023.
This paper reviews key challenges in evaluating eHealth intervention and behavior change programs, and makes recommendations for the types of designs, measures, and methods needed to accelerate the integration of proven eHealth programs into practice. Key issues discussed include evaluation approaches that answer questions that consumers, potential adoptees, and policymakers have. These include measures of participation and representativeness at both patient and healthcare setting levels, consistency of outcomes across different subgroups, tendency of an eHealth program to ameliorate versus exacerbate health disparities, implementation and program adaptation, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes. More practical eHealth trials are needed that use rigorous but creative designs compatible with eHealth interventions and theory. These evaluations should address key dissemination issues, such as appeal, use, and robustness of eHealth programs across different subgroups, settings, conditions, outcomes, and time.
本文回顾了评估电子健康干预和行为改变项目的关键挑战,并就将经过验证的电子健康项目整合到实践中所需的设计类型、测量方法和方式提出了建议。讨论的关键问题包括能回答消费者、潜在采用者和政策制定者所提问题的评估方法。这些问题包括患者和医疗机构层面的参与度和代表性衡量指标、不同亚组间结果的一致性、电子健康项目改善或加剧健康差距的趋势、实施和项目调整、成本以及生活质量结果。需要开展更具实用性的电子健康试验,采用与电子健康干预和理论相兼容的严谨而富有创造性的设计。这些评估应解决关键的传播问题,例如电子健康项目在不同亚组、环境、条件、结果和时间范围内的吸引力、使用情况和稳健性。