Marvin Christopher H, Hewitt L Mark
National Water Research Institute, Environment Canada, Burlington, ON, Canada.
Mutat Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;636(1-3):4-35. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2006.05.001. Epub 2007 Mar 18.
The combination of short-term bioassays and analytical chemical techniques has been successfully used in the identification of a variety of mutagenic compounds in complex mixtures. Much of the early work in the field of bioassay-directed fractionation resulted from the development of a short-term bacterial assay employing Salmonella typhimurium; this assay is commonly known as the Ames assay. Ideally, analytical methods for assessment of mutagenicity of any environmental matrix should exhibit characteristics including high capacity, good selectivity, good analytical resolution, non-destructiveness, and reproducibility. A variety of extraction solvents have been employed in investigations of mutagenicity of air particulate; sequential combination of dichloromethane followed by methanol is most popular. Soxhlet extraction has been the most common extraction method, followed by sonication. Attempts at initial fractionation using different extraction solvents have met with limited success and highlight the need for fractionation schemes applicable to moderately polar and polar mutagenic compounds. Fractionation methods reported in the literature are reviewed according to three general schemas: (i) acid/base/neutral partitioning followed by fractionation using open-column chromatography and/or HPLC; (ii) fractionation based on normal-phase (NP) HPLC using a cyanopropyl or chemically similar stationary phase; and (iii) fractionation by open-column chromatography followed by NP-HPLC. The HPLC methods may be preparative, semi-preparative, or analytical scale. Variations based on acid/base/neutral partitioning followed by a chromatographic separation have also been employed. Other lesser-used approaches involve fractionation based on ion-exchange and thin-layer chromatographies. Although some of the methodologies used in contemporary studies of mutagenicity of air particulate do not represent significant advances in technology over the past 30 years, their simplicity, low cost, effectiveness, and robustness combine to result in their continued application in modern laboratories.
短期生物测定法与分析化学技术的结合已成功用于鉴定复杂混合物中的多种诱变化合物。生物测定导向分级分离领域的许多早期工作源于采用鼠伤寒沙门氏菌的短期细菌测定法的发展;该测定法通常称为艾姆斯试验。理想情况下,用于评估任何环境基质诱变性的分析方法应具有高容量、良好的选择性、良好的分析分辨率、非破坏性和可重复性等特征。在空气颗粒物诱变性研究中已采用了多种萃取溶剂;二氯甲烷随后用甲醇的顺序组合最为常用。索氏提取一直是最常用的提取方法,其次是超声处理。使用不同萃取溶剂进行初步分级分离的尝试取得的成功有限,这突出了适用于中等极性和极性诱变化合物的分级分离方案的必要性。根据三种一般模式对文献中报道的分级分离方法进行了综述:(i) 酸/碱/中性分配,然后使用开放柱色谱法和/或高效液相色谱法进行分级分离;(ii) 使用氰丙基或化学性质相似的固定相基于正相(NP)高效液相色谱法进行分级分离;(iii) 通过开放柱色谱法进行分级分离,然后进行NP-HPLC。高效液相色谱法可以是制备规模、半制备规模或分析规模。也采用了基于酸/碱/中性分配随后进行色谱分离的变体方法。其他较少使用的方法包括基于离子交换和薄层色谱法的分级分离。尽管当代空气颗粒物诱变性研究中使用的一些方法在过去30年中在技术上没有显著进展,但它们的简单性、低成本、有效性和稳健性相结合,导致它们在现代实验室中仍在继续应用。