Tossonian Harout K, Raffa Jesse D, Grebely Jason, Trotter Brendon, Viljoen Mark, Mead Annabel, Khara Milan, McLean Mark, Duncan Fiona, Fraser Chris, DeVlaming Stanley, Conway Brian
Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007 Jul 1;45(3):324-7. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318061b5fd.
We have measured methadone dose adjustments and treatment responses after nevirapine (NVP)-, efavirenz (EFV)-, ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r), or atazanavir (ATV; with or without ritonavir)-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was initiated in injection drug users (IDUs).
We identified 120 IDUs receiving HAART and methadone within a directly observed therapy (DOT) program. Follow-up was according to clinical standards, with changes in methadone dose being made as required to achieve clinical stabilization within the first 3 months of HAART.
The observed median methadone dose changes from baseline were 20 mg/d (P<0.001) in patients on NVP, with 32 (86%) of 37 patients requiring daily dose increases, and 7.5 mg/d (P=0.004) in patients on EFV, with 11 (61%) of 18 patients requiring daily dose increases. Conversely, median changes were 0 mg/d for patients on LPV/r (P=0.56) or ATV (P=0.95). Virologic suppression (HIV RNA<400 copies/mL) was achieved in 26 (70%) of 37, 12 (67%) of 18, 25 (76%) of 33, and 24 (75%) of 32 patients receiving NVP-, EFV-, LPV/r-, and ATV-based regimens, respectively (P=0.89).
Although methadone-based DOT can be a successful tool for the coadministration of HAART, careful monitoring is required to ensure that methadone withdrawal does not adversely affect the goals of treatment, particularly when nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are used.
我们测量了在注射吸毒者(IDU)中启动基于奈韦拉平(NVP)、依非韦伦(EFV)、利托那韦增强的洛匹那韦(LPV/r)或阿扎那韦(ATV;有或没有利托那韦)的高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)后美沙酮剂量的调整情况和治疗反应。
我们在一个直接观察治疗(DOT)项目中确定了120名接受HAART和美沙酮治疗的IDU。按照临床标准进行随访,在HAART的前3个月内根据需要调整美沙酮剂量以实现临床稳定。
接受NVP治疗的患者中,观察到美沙酮剂量相对于基线的中位数变化为20mg/d(P<0.001),37名患者中有32名(86%)需要每日增加剂量;接受EFV治疗的患者中,美沙酮剂量中位数变化为7.5mg/d(P=0.004),18名患者中有11名(61%)需要每日增加剂量。相反,接受LPV/r(P=0.56)或ATV(P=0.95)治疗的患者美沙酮剂量中位数变化为0mg/d。分别接受基于NVP、EFV、LPV/r和ATV方案治疗的患者中,病毒学抑制(HIV RNA<400拷贝/mL)率分别为37名中的26名(70%)、18名中的12名(67%)、33名中的25名(76%)和32名中的24名(75%)(P=0.89)。
虽然基于美沙酮的DOT可以成为联合使用HAART的成功工具,但需要仔细监测以确保美沙酮戒断不会对治疗目标产生不利影响,特别是在使用非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂时。