一项关于耳科学当前争议的欧洲调查结果。
Results of a European survey on current controversies in otology.
作者信息
Preuss Simon Florian, Luers Jan-Christoffer, Beutner Dirk, Klussmann Jens Peter, Huttenbrink Karl Bernd
机构信息
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
出版信息
Otol Neurotol. 2007 Sep;28(6):774-7. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31805c74f1.
OBJECTIVE
Various topics in otology cause controversy among otologists internationally. The resulting variety of diagnostic and surgical concepts reflects differences between surgical schools and the lack of structured studies in the field.
INTERVENTIONS
During the "Third Instructional Workshop of the European Academy of Otology and Neuro-Otology," we interviewed 100 invited instructors using a written questionnaire on 13 controversial topics in otology.
RESULTS
The analyses of the survey showed a variety of different approaches in most otologic topics.
CONCLUSION
A further exchange of experiences and discussions in expert panels such as the Instructional Workshop of the European Academy of Otology and Neuro-Otology may help standardize concepts in otology for a safe, efficient, and cost-effective standard of care in otology.
目的
耳科学中的各种主题在国际耳科医生中引发了争议。由此产生的各种诊断和手术概念反映了不同手术流派之间的差异以及该领域缺乏系统性研究。
干预措施
在“欧洲耳科学与神经耳科学学会第三届教学研讨会”期间，我们使用书面问卷就耳科学中13个有争议的主题对100名受邀教员进行了访谈。
结果
调查分析显示，在大多数耳科主题上存在多种不同的方法。
结论
在诸如欧洲耳科学与神经耳科学学会教学研讨会这样的专家小组中进一步交流经验和进行讨论，可能有助于规范耳科学概念，以实现安全、高效且具有成本效益的耳科护理标准。
Zotero 插件