Horowitz Laura, Westlund Karolina, Ljungberg Tomas
Karolinska Institutet, Department of Woman and Child Health, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Unit, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2007 Oct;38(3):237-53. doi: 10.1007/s10578-007-0057-6. Epub 2007 Apr 28.
This study examined conflict behavior in naturalistic preschool settings to better understand the role of non-affiliative behavior and language in conflict management.
Free-play at preschool was filmed among 20 boys with typically developing language (TL) and among 11 boys with Language Impairment (LI); the boys 4-7 years old. Conflict behavior was coded and analyzed with a validated system. Post-conflict non-affiliative behavior (aggression and withdrawal) displays, and the links between the displays and reconciliation (i.e., former opponents exchange friendly behavioral shortly after conflict termination) was examined.
Group comparisons revealed boys with LI displayed aggression in a smaller share of conflicts, but exhibited [Symbol: see text]active' withdrawal (left the room), in a larger conflict share. Boys with TL overcame aggression (more common TL behavior) and after reconciled, to a greater extent than the boys with LI after active withdrawal (more common LI behavior). Also, after reciprocal or only verbal aggression, boys with LI reconciled to a lesser extent than boys with TL.
The boys with LI demonstrated difficulties confronting conflict management, as well as concluding emotionally heightened and aggressive behavioral turns.
本研究考察了自然主义学前环境中的冲突行为,以更好地理解非亲和行为和语言在冲突管理中的作用。
对20名语言发育正常(TL)的男孩和11名语言障碍(LI)的男孩在幼儿园的自由玩耍进行拍摄;这些男孩年龄在4至7岁。使用经过验证的系统对冲突行为进行编码和分析。研究了冲突后非亲和行为(攻击和退缩)的表现,以及这些表现与和解(即冲突结束后,前对手很快交换友好行为)之间的联系。
组间比较显示,LI组男孩在较小比例的冲突中表现出攻击性,但在较大比例的冲突中表现出“主动”退缩(离开房间)。TL组男孩克服攻击性(TL组更常见的行为)并达成和解的程度,比LI组男孩在主动退缩后(LI组更常见的行为)更大。此外,在相互攻击或仅言语攻击后,LI组男孩达成和解的程度低于TL组男孩。
LI组男孩在应对冲突管理以及结束情绪激动和攻击性的行为转变方面表现出困难。