Suppr超能文献

脊髓灰质炎与诺贝尔奖:回顾50年

Polio and Nobel prizes: looking back 50 years.

作者信息

Norrby Erling, Prusiner Stanley B

机构信息

Center for History of Science, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Ann Neurol. 2007 May;61(5):385-95. doi: 10.1002/ana.21153.

Abstract

In 1954, John Enders, Thomas Weller, and Frederick Robbins were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine "for their discovery of the ability of poliomyelitis viruses to grow in cultures of various types of tissue."5370 This discovery provided for the first time opportunities to produce both inactivated and live polio vaccines. By searching previously sealed Nobel Committee archives, we were able to review the deliberations that led to the award. It appears that Sven Gard, who was Professor of Virus Research at the Karolinska Institute and an adjunct member of the Nobel Committee at the time, played a major role in the events leading to the awarding of the Prize. It appears that Gard persuaded the College of Teachers at the Institute to decide not to follow the recommendation by their Nobel Committee to give the Prize to Vincent du Vigneaud. Another peculiar feature of the 1954 Prize is that Weller and Robbins were included based on only two nominations submitted for the first time that year. In his speech at the Nobel Prize ceremony, Gard mentioned the importance of the discovery for the future production of vaccines, but emphasized the implications of this work for growing many different, medically important viruses. We can only speculate on why later nominations highlighting the contributions of scientists such as Jonas Salk, Hilary Koprowski, and Albert Sabin in the development of poliovirus vaccines have not been recognized by a Nobel Prize.

摘要

1954年,约翰·恩德斯、托马斯·韦勒和弗雷德里克·罗宾斯被授予诺贝尔生理学或医学奖,“以表彰他们发现脊髓灰质炎病毒在各种组织培养物中生长的能力”。这一发现首次为生产灭活脊髓灰质炎疫苗和减毒活疫苗提供了机会。通过查阅此前封存的诺贝尔委员会档案,我们得以回顾导致该奖项颁发的审议过程。当时担任卡罗林斯卡学院病毒研究教授且为诺贝尔委员会附属成员的斯文·加德,似乎在导致该奖项颁发的一系列事件中发挥了主要作用。似乎是加德说服了该学院的教师委员会决定不遵循其诺贝尔委员会将奖项授予文森特·迪维尼奥的建议。1954年该奖项的另一个独特之处在于,韦勒和罗宾斯是基于当年首次提交的仅两份提名而获奖的。在诺贝尔奖颁奖典礼上的演讲中,加德提到了这一发现对未来疫苗生产的重要性,但强调了这项工作对培养许多不同的、具有医学重要性的病毒的意义。我们只能猜测,为何后来那些突出乔纳斯·索尔克、希拉里·科普罗夫斯基和阿尔伯特·萨宾等科学家在脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗研发中贡献的提名未获诺贝尔奖认可。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验