• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尤里卡错误:因努力归属错误导致的无意剽窃。

The eureka error: inadvertent plagiarism by misattributions of effort.

作者信息

Preston Jesse, Wegner Daniel M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Apr;92(4):575-84. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.575.

DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.575
PMID:17469945
Abstract

The authors found that the feeling of authorship for mental actions such as solving problems is enhanced by effort cues experienced during mental activity; misattribution of effort cues resulted in inadvertent plagiarism. Pairs of participants took turns solving anagrams as they exerted effort on an unrelated task. People inadvertently plagiarized their partners' answers more often when they experienced high incidental effort while working on the problem and reduced effort as the solution appeared. This result was found for efforts produced when participants squeezed a handgrip during the task (Experiment 1) or when the anagram was displayed in a font that was difficult to read (Experiments 2, 3a, and 3b). Plagiarism declined, however, when participants attended to the source of the effort cues (Experiments 3a and 3b). These results suggest that effort misattribution can influence authorship processing for mental activities.

摘要

作者发现,诸如解决问题等心理活动的自主感会因心理活动中体验到的努力线索而增强;努力线索的错误归因会导致无意的剽窃行为。参与者两两一组轮流解纵横字谜,同时他们在一项不相关的任务上付出努力。当人们在解决问题时体验到高附带努力且随着答案出现努力减少时,他们会更频繁地无意剽窃同伴的答案。当参与者在任务中挤压握力器时产生的努力(实验1),或者当纵横字谜以难以阅读的字体显示时(实验2、3a和3b),都发现了这一结果。然而,当参与者关注努力线索的来源时,剽窃行为减少了(实验3a和3b)。这些结果表明,努力的错误归因会影响心理活动的自主感处理。

相似文献

1
The eureka error: inadvertent plagiarism by misattributions of effort.尤里卡错误:因努力归属错误导致的无意剽窃。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Apr;92(4):575-84. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.575.
2
The Cloze procedure as a test of plagiarism: the influence of text readability.作为剽窃检测手段的完形填空测试:文本可读性的影响
J Psychol. 2005 May;139(3):221-31. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.139.3.221-232.
3
Discovery misattribution: when solving is confused with remembering.发现错误归因:当解决问题与记忆混淆时。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Nov;136(4):577-92. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.577.
4
Dissociation of two kinds of source attributions.
Am J Psychol. 2000 Winter;113(4):539-51.
5
Source credibility and idea improvement have independent effects on unconscious plagiarism errors in recall and generate-new tasks.来源可信度和观点改进对回忆和生成新任务中的无意识抄袭错误有独立影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):267-74. doi: 10.1037/a0013936.
6
The effect of reportable and unreportable hints on anagram solution and the aha! experience.可报告和不可报告的提示对字谜解决及“啊哈!”体验的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 1997 Dec;6(4):545-73. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1997.0325.
7
When elaboration leads to appropriation: unconscious plagiarism in a creative task.
Memory. 2005 Aug;13(6):561-73. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000232.
8
The credibility of a source influences the rate of unconscious plagiarism.
Memory. 1999 May;7(3):293-308. doi: 10.1080/096582199387931.
9
Inadvertent plagiarism in young and older adults: the role of working memory capacity in reducing memory errors.
Mem Cognit. 2007 Mar;35(2):231-41. doi: 10.3758/bf03193444.
10
Issues and rules for authors concerning authorship versus acknowledgements, dual publication, self plagiarism, and salami publishing.作者在署名与致谢、重复发表、自我剽窃及切香肠式发表方面的问题与规则。
Res Nurs Health. 2008 Aug;31(4):295-7. doi: 10.1002/nur.20280.

引用本文的文献

1
Imagination vs. routines: festive time, weekly time, and the predictive brain.想象与日常:节日时间、周时间与预测性大脑。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Apr 26;18:1357354. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1357354. eCollection 2024.
2
Action prediction modulates self-other integration in joint action.动作预测调节共同动作中的自我-他人整合。
Psychol Res. 2023 Mar;87(2):537-552. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01674-y. Epub 2022 May 4.
3
Plagiarism - please don't copy.剽窃——请勿抄袭。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Oct;64(4):403-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03042.x.