Sami David, Young Steven, Petersen Robert
Division of Ophthalmology, Pediatric Subspecialty Faculty, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, California 92868, USA.
Surv Ophthalmol. 2007 May-Jun;52(3):244-65. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2007.02.007.
The philosophy and design of orbital enucleation implants have evolved significantly over the past 50 years. Animal studies and improved imaging techniques have changed our understanding about the physiology and anatomy of the post-enucleation orbit. Changes in implant design and biomaterials have reduced complication rates. It is our impression that for many ophthalmic professionals in training, the rational behind the current thinking in implant design and biomaterials is unclear. This is in part related to the older literature on orbital enucleation implants, which is scattered and at times contradictory. This review aims to present the historical information in a coherent and concise form; provide evidence based review of changes in the practice patterns of enucleation; identify areas of continuing controversy; and highlight gaps in the scientific literature about orbital implants, in particular, the poor understanding of implant and prosthesis motility.
在过去50年里,眼眶摘除植入物的理念和设计有了显著发展。动物研究和改进的成像技术改变了我们对眼球摘除术后眼眶生理和解剖结构的认识。植入物设计和生物材料的变化降低了并发症发生率。我们的印象是,对于许多正在接受培训的眼科专业人员来说,当前植入物设计和生物材料的思考背后的原理并不清楚。这部分与关于眼眶摘除植入物的旧文献有关,这些文献分散且有时相互矛盾。本综述旨在以连贯和简洁的形式呈现历史信息;对眼球摘除术实践模式的变化进行循证综述;确定持续存在争议的领域;并突出关于眼眶植入物的科学文献中的空白,特别是对植入物和假体运动的理解不足。