Hunter D J, Lo G H, Gale D, Grainger A J, Guermazi A, Conaghan P G
Boston University Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, 715 Albany St., Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Feb;67(2):206-11. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.066183. Epub 2007 May 1.
MRI provides unparalleled visualisation of all the anatomical structures involved in the osteoarthritis (OA) process. There is a need for reliable methods of quantifying abnormalities of these structures. The aim of this work was to assess the reliability of a novel MRI scoring system for evaluating OA of the knee and explore the validity of the bone marrow lesion (BML) scoring component of this new tool.
After review of the relevant literature, a collaborative group of rheumatologists and radiologists from centres in the UK and USA established preliminary anatomical divisions, items (necessarily broadly inclusive) and scaling for a novel semi-quantitative knee score. A series of iterative reliability exercises were performed to reduce the initial items, and the reliability of the resultant Boston-Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score (BLOKS) was examined. A further sample had both the BLOKS and WORMS (Whole Organ MRI Score) bone marrow lesion (BML) score performed to assess the construct validity (relation to knee pain) and longitudinal validity (prediction of cartilage loss) of each scoring method.
The BLOKS scoring method assesses nine intra-articular regions and contains eight items, including features of bone marrow lesions, cartilage, osteophytes, synovitis, effusions and ligaments. The scaling for each feature ranges from 0-3. The inter-reader reliability for the final BLOKS items ranged from 0.51 for meniscal extrusion up to 0.79 for meniscal tear. The reliability for other key features was 0.72 for BML grade, 0.72 for cartilage morphology, and 0.62 for synovitis. Maximal BML size on the BLOKS scale had a positive linear relation with visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, however the WORMS scale did not. Baseline BML was associated with cartilage loss on both BLOKS and WORMS scale. This association was stronger for BLOKS than WORMS.
We have designed a novel scoring system for MRI OA knee, BLOKS, that demonstrates good reliability. Preliminary inspection of the validity of one of the components of this new tool supports the validity of the BLOKS BML scoring method over an existing instrument. Further iterative development will include validation for use in both clinical trials and epidemiological studies.
磁共振成像(MRI)能无比清晰地显示骨关节炎(OA)进程中涉及的所有解剖结构。因此需要可靠的方法来量化这些结构的异常情况。本研究旨在评估一种用于评估膝关节OA的新型MRI评分系统的可靠性,并探究该新工具中骨髓损伤(BML)评分部分的有效性。
在查阅相关文献后,来自英国和美国各中心的一组风湿病学家和放射科医生组成的协作团队,为一种新型的半定量膝关节评分系统确定了初步的解剖分区、项目(必然具有广泛的包容性)和评分标准。进行了一系列迭代可靠性练习以减少初始项目,并检验最终的波士顿 - 利兹骨关节炎膝关节评分(BLOKS)的可靠性。另一组样本同时进行了BLOKS和全器官MRI评分(WORMS)的骨髓损伤(BML)评分,以评估每种评分方法的结构效度(与膝关节疼痛的关系)和纵向效度(对软骨损伤的预测)。
BLOKS评分方法评估九个关节内区域,包含八个项目,包括骨髓损伤、软骨、骨赘、滑膜炎、积液和韧带的特征。每个特征的评分范围为0至3。最终BLOKS项目的阅片者间信度,半月板挤出为0.51,半月板撕裂为0.79。其他关键特征的信度,BML分级为0.72,软骨形态为0.72,滑膜炎为0.62。BLOKS量表上的最大BML大小与视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛呈正线性关系,而WORMS量表则不然。基线BML在BLOKS和WORMS量表上均与软骨损伤相关。这种关联在BLOKS上比在WORMS上更强。
我们设计了一种用于MRI膝关节OA的新型评分系统BLOKS,它具有良好的可靠性。对该新工具其中一个组成部分有效性的初步检验表明,BLOKS的BML评分方法比现有工具更有效。进一步的迭代开发将包括在临床试验和流行病学研究中的验证。