Davidoff Amy, Hill Ian, Courtot Brigette, Adams Emerald
Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA.
Pediatrics. 2007 May;119(5):956-64. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2222.
Our goal was to estimate the effects of managed care program type on service use and access for publicly insured children with chronic health conditions.
Data on Medicaid and State Children's Health Insurance Program managed care programs were linked by county and year to pooled data from the 1997-2002 National Health Interview Survey. We used multivariate techniques to examine the effects of managed care program type, relative to fee-for-service, on a broad array of service use and access outcomes.
Relative to fee-for-service, managed care program assignment was associated with selected reductions in service use but not with deterioration in reported access. Capitated managed care plans with mental health or specialty carve-outs were associated with a 7.4-percentage-point reduction in the probability of a specialist visit, a 6.3-percentage-point reduction in the probability of a mental health specialty visit, and a 5.9-percentage-point decrease in the probability of regular prescription drug use. Reductions in use associated with primary care case management and integrated capitated programs (without carve-outs) were more limited, and integrated capitated plans were associated with a reduction in unmet medical care need. We failed to find significant effects of special managed care programs for children with chronic health conditions.
Managed care is associated with reduced service use, particularly when capitated programs carve out services. This finding is of key policy importance, as the proportion of children enrolled in plans with carve-out arrangements has been increasing over time. It is not possible to determine whether reductions in services represent better care management or skimping. However, despite the reductions in use, we did not observe a corresponding increase in perceived unmet need; thus, the net change may represent improved care management.
我们的目标是评估管理式医疗计划类型对患有慢性健康状况的公共保险儿童的服务使用和可及性的影响。
医疗补助计划和州儿童健康保险计划管理式医疗计划的数据按县和年份与1997 - 2002年国家健康访谈调查的汇总数据相链接。我们使用多变量技术来检验管理式医疗计划类型相对于按服务收费模式对一系列广泛的服务使用和可及性结果的影响。
相对于按服务收费模式,管理式医疗计划的分配与某些服务使用的减少相关,但与报告的可及性恶化无关。有心理健康或专科分离条款的按人头付费管理式医疗计划与专科就诊概率降低7.4个百分点、心理健康专科就诊概率降低6.3个百分点以及常规处方药使用概率降低5.9个百分点相关。与初级保健病例管理和综合按人头付费计划(无分离条款)相关的使用减少更为有限,并且综合按人头付费计划与未满足的医疗需求减少相关。我们未发现针对患有慢性健康状况儿童的特殊管理式医疗计划有显著影响。
管理式医疗与服务使用减少相关,特别是当按人头付费计划分离服务时。这一发现具有关键的政策重要性,因为随着时间推移,参加有分离安排计划的儿童比例一直在增加。无法确定服务减少是代表更好的护理管理还是偷工减料。然而,尽管使用减少,但我们并未观察到感知到的未满足需求相应增加;因此,净变化可能代表护理管理的改善。