Flyckt V M M, Raaymakers B W, Kroeze H, Lagendijk J J W
Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Phys Med Biol. 2007 May 21;52(10):2691-701. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/10/004. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
The eye is considered to be a critical organ when determining safety standards for radiofrequency radiation. With a detailed anatomy of the human eye and orbit inserted in a whole-head model, the specific absorption rates (SARs) and thermal effects were determined under exposure to a dipole antenna representing a mobile phone operating at 900, 1500 and 1800 MHz with an output power of 1 W. The temperature rise was calculated by taking the blood flow into account either by the Pennes bioheat model or by including the discrete vasculature (DIVA). In addition, a simple spherical model using constant heat transfer coefficients was used. Peak SARs in the humour are 4.5, 7.7 and 8.4 W kg(-1) for 900, 1500 and 1800 MHz respectively. Averaged over the whole eyeball, the SARs are 1.7, 2.5 and 2.2 W kg(-1). The maximum temperature rises in the eye due to the exposure are 0.22, 0.27 and 0.25 degrees C for exposure of 900, 1500 and 1800 MHz, respectively, calculated with DIVA. For the Pennes bioheat model, the temperature rises are slightly lower: 0.19, 0.24, 0.22 degrees C respectively. For the simple spherical model, the maximum temperature rises are 0.15, 0.22 and 0.20 degrees C. The peak temperature is located in the anterior part of the lens for 900 MHz and deeper in the eye for higher frequencies, and in the posterior part of the lens for 1500 MHz and close to the centre of the eyeball for 1800 MHz. For these RF safety applications, both DIVA and the Pennes bioheat model could be used to relate the SAR distributions to the resulting temperature distributions. Even though, for these artificial exposure conditions, the SAR values are not in compliance with safety guidelines, the maximum temperature rises in the eye are too small to give harmful effects. The temperature in the eye also remains below body core temperature.
在确定射频辐射的安全标准时,眼睛被视为一个关键器官。将详细的人眼和眼眶解剖结构嵌入全头模型中,在暴露于代表工作频率为900、1500和1800 MHz、输出功率为1 W的手机的偶极天线的情况下,测定了比吸收率(SAR)和热效应。通过Pennes生物热模型或纳入离散脉管系统(DIVA)来考虑血流,计算温度升高情况。此外,还使用了一个采用恒定传热系数的简单球形模型。在房水中,900、1500和1800 MHz时的峰值SAR分别为4.5、7.7和8.4 W·kg⁻¹。在整个眼球上平均,SAR分别为1.7、2.5和2.2 W·kg⁻¹。使用DIVA计算得出,由于暴露,眼睛中的最高温度升高分别为900、1500和1800 MHz时的0.22、0.27和0.25℃。对于Pennes生物热模型,温度升高略低:分别为0.19、0.24、0.22℃。对于简单球形模型,最高温度升高分别为0.15、0.22和0.20℃。900 MHz时峰值温度位于晶状体前部,较高频率时位于眼内更深部位,1500 MHz时位于晶状体后部,1800 MHz时靠近眼球中心。对于这些射频安全应用,DIVA和Pennes生物热模型均可用于将SAR分布与产生的温度分布联系起来。尽管在这些人工暴露条件下,SAR值不符合安全指南,但眼睛中的最高温度升高过小,不会产生有害影响。眼睛中的温度也保持在低于身体核心温度的水平。