• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你想要什么?感知者如何利用线索对他人做出目标推断。

What do you want? How perceivers use cues to make goal inferences about others.

作者信息

Magliano Joseph P, Skowronski John J, Britt M Anne, Güss C Dominik, Forsythe Chris

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):594-632. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.010. Epub 2007 May 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.010
PMID:17475232
Abstract

Variables influencing inferences about a stranger's goal during an unsolicited social interaction were explored. Experiment 1 developed a procedure for identifying cues. Experiments 2 and 3 assessed the relative importance of various cues (space, time, characteristics of oneself, characteristics of the stranger, and the stranger's behavior) for goal judgments. Results indicated that situational context cues informed goal judgments in ways that were consistent with diagnosticity ratings and typicality ratings of those cues. Stranger characteristics and stranger behaviors affected goal judgments more than would be expected from these quantitative measures of their informativeness. Nonetheless, the results are consistent with a mental model view that assumes perceivers monitor situational cues present during interactions and that goal inferences are guided by the informativeness of these cues.

摘要

研究了在自发社交互动中影响对陌生人目标推断的变量。实验1开发了一种识别线索的程序。实验2和3评估了各种线索(空间、时间、自身特征、陌生人特征以及陌生人行为)在目标判断中的相对重要性。结果表明,情境线索以与这些线索的诊断性评级和典型性评级相一致的方式为目标判断提供信息。陌生人特征和陌生人行为对目标判断的影响比根据这些线索信息量的定量测量所预期的更大。尽管如此,这些结果与一种心理模型观点一致,该观点假设感知者会监测互动过程中出现的情境线索,并且目标推断受这些线索信息量的引导。

相似文献

1
What do you want? How perceivers use cues to make goal inferences about others.你想要什么?感知者如何利用线索对他人做出目标推断。
Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):594-632. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.010. Epub 2007 May 1.
2
Birds of a feather and birds flocking together: physical versus behavioral cues may lead to trait- versus goal-based group perception.物以类聚,鸟以群分:物理线索与行为线索可能导致基于特质与基于目标的群体认知。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Mar;90(3):368-81. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.368.
3
Inside the mind reader's tool kit: projection and stereotyping in mental state inference.读心者的工具包:心理状态推断中的投射与刻板印象
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Sep;87(3):340-53. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.340.
4
Impressions of Milgram's obedient teachers: situational cues inform inferences about motives and traits.对米尔格拉姆实验中顺从的“教师”的印象:情境线索影响对动机和特质的推断。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jul;95(1):1-17. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.1.
5
"You can't tell just by looking!": beliefs in the diagnosticity of visual cues explain response biases in social categorization.“不能仅凭外观判断!”:对视觉线索诊断性的信念解释了社会分类中的反应偏差。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;40(11):1494-506. doi: 10.1177/0146167214549323. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
6
Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation.男性性取向认知与分类中的准确性和意识
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Nov;95(5):1019-28. doi: 10.1037/a0013194.
7
The personality of familiar and significant people: the lay perceiver as a social-cognitive theorist.熟悉且重要人物的个性:作为社会认知理论家的普通感知者
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Apr;80(4):585-96.
8
What you want (and do not want) affects what you see (and do not see): avoidance social goals and social events.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;32(11):1446-58. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291007.
9
Values as predictors of judgments and behaviors: the role of abstract and concrete mindsets.作为判断和行为预测指标的价值观:抽象思维和具象思维的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jan;96(1):231-47. doi: 10.1037/a0013836.
10
Incorporating if...then...personality signatures in person perception: beyond the person-situation dichotomy.将“如果……那么……”性格特征纳入对人的认知:超越人与情境的二分法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Apr;88(4):605-18. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.605.