Suppr超能文献

访谈认知受损的老年人:认知访谈有多大用处?

Interviewing cognitively impaired older adults: how useful is a cognitive interview?

作者信息

Wright Allison M, Holliday Robyn E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Keynes College, University of Portsmouth, UK.

出版信息

Memory. 2007 Jan;15(1):17-33. doi: 10.1080/09658210601047351.

Abstract

This research examined whether an Enhanced Cognitive Interview (ECI) and a Modified Cognitive Interview (MCI) improved 75- to 96-year-old adults' recall for a video-taped event. Specifically, we examined the effectiveness of these interviews in relation to a Structured Interview (control), and compared the performance of older adults who scored high or low on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), which is a test to assess cognitive functioning. Participants with low MMSE scores recalled fewer correct details, and were less accurate than those with high scores. Nevertheless, both high and low MMSE groups reported substantially more correct information about Action, Person, Object, and Surrounding details with the MCI and ECI than with the SI. No corresponding increase in the amount of incorrect and confabulated information was found. Furthermore, recall accuracy for both groups was greater with the ECI and MCI than with the Structured Interview. Overall, findings suggest that older individuals, including those with reduced cognitive ability can benefit from the use of Cognitive Interview protocols.

摘要

本研究考察了强化认知访谈(ECI)和改良认知访谈(MCI)是否能提高75至96岁成年人对录像事件的回忆能力。具体而言,我们考察了这些访谈相对于结构化访谈(对照组)的有效性,并比较了在简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)中得分高或低的老年人的表现,MMSE是一种评估认知功能的测试。MMSE得分低的参与者回忆起的正确细节较少,且不如得分高的参与者准确。然而,与结构化访谈相比,MMSE得分高和低的两组在使用MCI和ECI时,报告的关于动作、人物、物体和周围细节的正确信息都显著更多。未发现错误和虚构信息的数量有相应增加。此外,与结构化访谈相比,两组在使用ECI和MCI时的回忆准确性更高。总体而言,研究结果表明,包括认知能力下降的老年人在内,都能从使用认知访谈方案中受益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验