• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后男性的经历:一项质性描述性研究。

Men's experiences following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a qualitative descriptive study.

作者信息

Milne Jill L, Spiers Judith A, Moore Katherine N

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., Canada.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 May;45(5):765-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.006. Epub 2007 May 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.006
PMID:17482192
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a less invasive surgical option to the open retropubic approach for prostate cancer that will likely grow in popularity commensurate with availability. However, since little is known about what men experience throughout the postoperative period, our ability to ensure informed decision-making remains compromised.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore what men experience following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and how adequately their pre- and postoperative needs are being met.

DESIGN

This was a qualitative descriptive study.

PARTICIPANTS

Nineteen men, aged 46-76, who had undergone laparoscopic radical prostatectomy within the previous 3-6 months period were recruited from the treatment and control arms of a randomized controlled trial. Men who were not in the trial were recruited via letters mailed from surgeons' offices.

METHODS

Data were generated during loosely structured individual (n=5) and focus group interviews (n=3). Inductive content analysis helped to ensure that participants' perspectives were accurately represented.

RESULTS

Men had actively sought information prior to surgery but seemed unprepared for the intensity of discomfort and incontinence they experienced. They particularly valued opportunities for informal discussion with former prostatectomy patients; however, erectile dysfunction remained a major concern and most did not know where to turn for help.

CONCLUSION

Nurses could play a pivotal role in the laparoscopic radical prostatectomy experience by ensuring men are well informed both pre- and postoperatively. Facilitating contact with other men who have undergone laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and initiating conversation about potential side-effects such as urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction would be an important starting point. Particularly in light of early discharge and concerns regarding erectile dysfunction, additional follow-up seems warranted.

摘要

背景

对于前列腺癌,腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术是一种比开放性耻骨后入路侵入性更小的手术选择,随着其可及性提高,可能会越来越受欢迎。然而,由于对男性在术后整个阶段的经历了解甚少,我们确保患者做出明智决策的能力仍然受到影响。

目的

本研究旨在探讨男性在腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后的经历,以及他们术前和术后的需求得到满足的程度。

设计

这是一项定性描述性研究。

参与者

从一项随机对照试验的治疗组和对照组中招募了19名年龄在46 - 76岁之间、在过去3 - 6个月内接受过腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的男性。未参加该试验的男性通过外科医生办公室邮寄的信件招募。

方法

在结构松散的个人访谈(n = 5)和焦点小组访谈(n = 3)中收集数据。归纳性内容分析有助于确保准确呈现参与者的观点。

结果

男性在手术前积极寻求信息,但似乎对他们所经历的不适和尿失禁的严重程度没有做好准备。他们特别重视与以前接受过前列腺切除术的患者进行非正式讨论的机会;然而,勃起功能障碍仍然是一个主要问题,大多数人不知道该向何处寻求帮助。

结论

护士在腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的过程中可以发挥关键作用,确保男性在术前和术后都充分了解情况。促进与其他接受过腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)的男性接触,并就尿失禁和勃起功能障碍等潜在副作用展开对话将是一个重要的起点。特别是考虑到早期出院以及对勃起功能障碍的担忧,额外的随访似乎是必要的。

相似文献

1
Men's experiences following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a qualitative descriptive study.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后男性的经历:一项质性描述性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 May;45(5):765-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.006. Epub 2007 May 4.
2
Australian men's long term experiences following prostatectomy: a qualitative descriptive study.前列腺切除术后澳大利亚男性的长期经历:一项质性描述性研究。
Contemp Nurse. 2009;34(1):98-109.
3
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a less invasive approach.腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:一种侵入性较小的手术方法。
Can Oper Room Nurs J. 2006 Sep;24(3):31, 33, 36-7.
4
Individual quality of life following radical prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer.前列腺癌男性患者根治性前列腺切除术后的个体生活质量。
Urol Nurs. 2005 Apr;25(2):88-90, 95-100.
5
Radical prostatectomy: men's experiences and postoperative needs.根治性前列腺切除术:男性的经历及术后需求。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):883-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01123.x.
6
Follow up of men post-prostatectomy: who is responsible?前列腺切除术后男性的随访:谁来负责?
Urol Nurs. 2008 Oct;28(5):370-7; discussion 378-80.
7
Responses and experiences after radical prostatectomy: perceptions of married couples in Switzerland.根治性前列腺切除术后的反应与经历:瑞士已婚夫妇的看法
Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Jul;41(5):507-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2003.11.005.
8
Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of postoperative urinary incontinence rates.开放性与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:术后尿失禁发生率的前瞻性比较
J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):615-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.022.
9
Quality of life after radical prostatectomy.前列腺癌根治术后的生活质量。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Mar-Apr;30(2):E24-32. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.E24-E32.
10
Management of urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的管理。
Urol Nurs. 2004 Dec;24(6):475-82, 515.

引用本文的文献

1
Qualitative studies on men with prostate cancer: a systematic meta-synthesis.关于前列腺癌男性患者的定性研究:一项系统的元综合分析。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2025 Dec;20(1):2436720. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2436720. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
2
Exploring the Hidden Struggles: A Qualitative Insight into Urinary Incontinence Among Prostate Cancer Survivors Post-Surgery.探索隐藏的挣扎:对前列腺癌幸存者术后尿失禁问题的定性洞察
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 May 28;18:1047-1058. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S461027. eCollection 2024.
3
Treatment burden in individuals living with and beyond cancer: A systematic review of qualitative literature.
癌症患者及其康复者的治疗负担:定性文献的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 May 25;18(5):e0286308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286308. eCollection 2023.
4
Canadian Men's Self-Management of Chronic Diseases: A Literature Analysis of Strategies for Dealing With Risks and Promoting Wellness.加拿大男性慢性病自我管理:应对风险与促进健康策略的文献分析
Am J Mens Health. 2017 Jul;11(4):1077-1095. doi: 10.1177/1557988315577674. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
5
Men's experience with penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy: a qualitative study with the goal of informing a therapeutic intervention.根治性前列腺切除术后男性阴茎康复的经历:一项旨在为治疗干预提供依据的定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2015 Dec;24(12):1646-54. doi: 10.1002/pon.3771. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
6
Prostate cancer and supportive care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of men's experiences and unmet needs.前列腺癌与支持性护理:对男性经历及未满足需求的系统评价与定性综合分析
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015 Sep;24(5):618-34. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12286. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
7
Health care professionals' views on discussing sexual wellbeing with patients who have had a stroke: a qualitative study.医护人员对与曾中风患者讨论性健康的看法:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 29;8(10):e78802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078802. eCollection 2013.
8
A dialogue-based Web application enhances personalized access to healthcare professionals--an intervention study.基于对话的网络应用程序增强了与医疗保健专业人员的个性化访问 - 一项干预研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Sep 4;12:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-96.
9
Men's experience of erectile dysfunction after treatment for colorectal cancer: qualitative interview study.男性结直肠癌治疗后勃起功能障碍的体验:定性访谈研究。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5824. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5824.