Knopp R H, Magee M S, Raisys V, Benedetti T
Northwest Lipid Research Clinic, Seattle, WA 98104.
Diabetes. 1991 Dec;40 Suppl 2:165-71. doi: 10.2337/diab.40.2.s165.
Although hypocaloric diets have been advocated for the management of the obese gravida and the obese mother with gestational diabetes, there is no general agreement on how severely calories should be restricted or on how this therapeutic approach compares with insulin therapy. The lack of consensus is in part because of the lack of studies comparing insulin management with the effects of different degrees of hypocaloric feeding and its effects on metabolism and glycemic status. We review the effects of 50 and 33% calorie restriction on glycemic status and intermediary fuel status in obese gestational diabetic subjects and compare the results with the administration of 20 U NPH and 10 U regular insulin every morning, a therapy of proven value in reducing macrosomia in gestational diabetes. When the two calorie-restriction regimens were compared after a 9-h overnight fast, glycemic status improved 10-20% on both. Ketonuria increased about twofold with 50% calorie restriction, but on average no increase in ketonuria was seen on the 33% calorie-restriction regimen. Both calorie-restriction programs led to a reduction in levels of plasma triglyceride, a correlate of infant birth weight. In contrast, the insulin regimen diminished ketonuria, but glycemic status improved little, and plasma triglyceride concentrations did not decline. Although more studies are needed to confirm these trends, the beneficial effect of 33% calorie restriction, which occurred without marked ketonuria, is consistent with previous studies in gestational diabetes. In addition, the simultaneous improvements observed in plasma glucose and triglyceride concentrations suggest that moderate calorie restriction may be valuable in preventing macrosomia in the offspring of the obese subject with gestational diabetes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
尽管低热量饮食已被提倡用于管理肥胖孕妇及患有妊娠期糖尿病的肥胖母亲,但对于热量应严格限制到何种程度,以及这种治疗方法与胰岛素治疗相比效果如何,目前尚无普遍共识。缺乏共识部分是因为缺乏将胰岛素管理与不同程度低热量喂养的效果及其对代谢和血糖状态影响进行比较的研究。我们回顾了肥胖妊娠期糖尿病患者中50%和33%热量限制对血糖状态和中间燃料状态的影响,并将结果与每天早晨注射20单位中效胰岛素和10单位普通胰岛素的治疗效果进行比较,后者是一种已证实对降低妊娠期糖尿病巨大儿发生率有价值的治疗方法。在禁食9小时后比较两种热量限制方案时,两种方案的血糖状态均改善了10%-20%。50%热量限制时酮尿症增加了约两倍,但在33%热量限制方案中平均未见酮尿症增加。两种热量限制方案均导致血浆甘油三酯水平降低,而血浆甘油三酯与婴儿出生体重相关。相比之下,胰岛素治疗方案减少了酮尿症,但血糖状态改善甚微,血浆甘油三酯浓度未下降。尽管需要更多研究来证实这些趋势,但33%热量限制在无明显酮尿症情况下产生的有益效果与先前关于妊娠期糖尿病的研究一致。此外,同时观察到的血糖和甘油三酯浓度改善表明,适度热量限制对于预防肥胖妊娠期糖尿病患者后代的巨大儿可能有价值。(摘要截选至250字)