Gillespie Jennifer L, Arnold Kathryn E, Noble-Wang Judith, Jensen Bette, Arduino Matthew, Hageman Jeffrey, Srinivasan Arjun
Georgia Department of Human Resources Division of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Urology. 2007 May;69(5):912-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.047.
After the Georgia Department of Human Resources Division of Public Health was notified about 4 patients who were hospitalized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections after outpatient transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies in July 2005, we investigated the cause of, and risk factors for, the infections.
We enhanced surveillance for additional cases, reviewed medical records, evaluated biopsy equipment and infection control practices, and collected environmental samples. Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy procedures were discontinued during the investigation.
A total of 4 cases were identified. All patients were men aged 57 to 71 years. All 4 recovered with antimicrobial therapy. P. aeruginosa was isolated from the narrow lumen of the steel biopsy needle guide that had been soaking in high-level disinfectant for several days. The needle guide isolate and three available clinical isolates were indistinguishable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. A review of the reprocessing procedures of the biopsy needle guide revealed that it was disinfected by submersion in high-level disinfectant rather than sterilization, the reprocessing procedure recommended by the manufacturer. Manual cleaning of the lumen was limited to flushing. After disinfection, the guide was rinsed with nonsterile tap water.
The outbreak resulted from a contaminated needle guide. The needle guide reprocessing procedures were inadequate. Potential causes of P. aeruginosa contamination include the lack of adequate manual cleaning before disinfection, failure to sterilize the needle guide, and the use of a tap-water rinse after disinfection. Clinicians performing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy procedures should follow the manufacturers' needle guide reprocessing recommendations or use disposable needle guides.
2005年7月,佐治亚州人力资源部公共卫生司接到通知,有4名患者在门诊经直肠超声引导下进行前列腺活检后因感染铜绿假单胞菌而住院,我们对这些感染的原因及危险因素展开了调查。
我们加强了对其他病例的监测,查阅了病历,评估了活检设备及感染控制措施,并采集了环境样本。调查期间停止了经直肠超声引导下的前列腺活检操作。
共确认4例病例。所有患者均为57至71岁男性。所有4例患者经抗菌治疗后均康复。从浸泡在高水平消毒剂中数天的钢制活检针导针器狭窄管腔中分离出了铜绿假单胞菌。通过脉冲场凝胶电泳,针导器分离株与3株可得的临床分离株无法区分。对活检针导针器的再处理程序进行审查发现,它是通过浸泡在高水平消毒剂中进行消毒的,而非制造商推荐的再处理程序——灭菌。管腔的人工清洁仅限于冲洗。消毒后,导针器用非无菌自来水冲洗。
此次疫情是由受污染的针导器引起的。针导器的再处理程序不充分。铜绿假单胞菌污染的潜在原因包括消毒前人工清洁不充分、未对针导器进行灭菌以及消毒后使用自来水冲洗。进行经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检操作的临床医生应遵循制造商的针导器再处理建议,或使用一次性针导器。