• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床实验室检验质量指标:从理论到实践. IFCC 工作组项目"检验误差与患者安全"的初步数据

Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice. Preliminary data from the IFCC Working Group Project "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety".

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Center of Biomedical Research, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 May;49(5):835-44. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.128. Epub 2011 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1515/CCLM.2011.128
PMID:21342024
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The adoption of Quality Indicators (QIs) has prompted the development of tools to measure and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of laboratory testing, first in the hospital setting and subsequently in ambulatory and other care settings. While Laboratory Medicine has an important role in the delivery of high-quality care, no consensus exists as yet on the use of QIs focussing on all steps of the laboratory total testing process (TTP), and further research in this area is required.

METHODS

In order to reduce errors in laboratory testing, the IFCC Working Group on "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety" (WG-LEPS) developed a series of Quality Indicators, specifically designed for clinical laboratories. In the first phase of the project, specific QIs for key processes of the TTP were identified, including all the pre-, intra- and post-analytic steps. The overall aim of the project is to create a common reporting system for clinical laboratories based on standardized data collection, and to define state-of-the-art and Quality Specifications (QSs) for each QI independent of: a) the size of organization and type of activities; b) the complexity of processes undertaken; and c) different degree of knowledge and ability of the staff. The aim of the present paper is to report the results collected from participating laboratories from February 2008 to December 2009 and to identify preliminary QSs.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate that a Model of Quality Indicators managed as an External Quality Assurance Program can serve as a tool to monitor and control the pre-, intra- and post-analytical activities. It might also allow clinical laboratories to identify risks that lead to errors resulting in patient harm: identification and design of practices that eliminate medical errors; the sharing of information and education of clinical and laboratory teams on practices that reduce or prevent errors; the monitoring and evaluation of improvement activities.

摘要

背景

质量指标(QIs)的采用促使人们开发了测量和评估实验室检测质量和效果的工具,最初是在医院环境中,随后在门诊和其他护理环境中。虽然检验医学在提供高质量护理方面发挥着重要作用,但目前尚未就专注于实验室总检测过程(TTP)所有步骤的 QIs 使用达成共识,因此需要在这一领域开展进一步研究。

方法

为了减少实验室检测中的错误,国际临床化学联合会(IFCC)“实验室误差与患者安全”工作组(WG-LEPS)开发了一系列专门针对临床实验室的质量指标。在项目的第一阶段,确定了 TTP 关键流程的特定 QIs,包括所有分析前、分析中和分析后步骤。该项目的总体目标是基于标准化数据收集,为临床实验室创建一个通用报告系统,并为每个 QI 定义最先进的质量规范(QS),而不受以下因素的影响:a)组织规模和活动类型;b)开展的流程复杂性;以及 c)员工不同程度的知识和能力。本文旨在报告 2008 年 2 月至 2009 年 12 月期间参加实验室收集的数据结果,并确定初步的 QS。

结果与结论

结果表明,作为一种外部质量保证计划管理的质量指标模型可作为一种工具,用于监测和控制分析前、分析中和分析后活动。它还可以使临床实验室识别导致患者伤害的错误风险:识别和设计消除医疗错误的实践;共享信息和对临床及实验室团队进行减少或预防错误的实践教育;监测和评估改进活动。

相似文献

1
Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice. Preliminary data from the IFCC Working Group Project "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety".临床实验室检验质量指标:从理论到实践. IFCC 工作组项目"检验误差与患者安全"的初步数据
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 May;49(5):835-44. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.128. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
2
Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: the status of the progress of IFCC Working Group "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety" project.临床实验室检验质量指标:国际临床化学联合会工作组“检验误差及患者安全”项目进展状况。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Mar 1;55(3):348-357. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0929.
3
Performance criteria and quality indicators for the post-analytical phase.分析后阶段的性能标准和质量指标。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Jul 1;54(7):1169-76. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0897.
4
Call for Enrolling More Professionals in the IFCC Project on Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety.呼吁更多专业人员参与国际临床化学和检验医学联合会(IFCC)关于实验室差错与患者安全的项目。
EJIFCC. 2011 Mar 14;22(1):1-5. eCollection 2011 Mar.
5
Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. A preliminary consensus.检验医学质量指标的协调统一:初步共识
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014 Jul;52(7):951-8. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0142.
6
The use of preanalytical quality indicators: a Turkish preliminary survey study.使用分析前质量指标:土耳其初步调查研究。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Oct 20;59(5):837-843. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1426. Print 2021 Apr 27.
7
Extra-analytical quality indicators and laboratory performances.分析外质量指标与实验室性能
Clin Biochem. 2017 Jul;50(10-11):632-637. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.03.020. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
8
Defining a roadmap for harmonizing quality indicators in Laboratory Medicine: a consensus statement on behalf of the IFCC Working Group "Laboratory Error and Patient Safety" and EFLM Task and Finish Group "Performance specifications for the extra-analytical phases".制定检验医学质量指标协调路线图:代表国际临床化学和检验医学联合会(IFCC)“检验误差与患者安全”工作组以及欧洲临床化学和实验室医学学会(EFLM)“分析前和分析后阶段性能规范”任务与完成小组的共识声明。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Aug 28;55(10):1478-1488. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0412.
9
National surveys on 15 quality indicators for the total testing process in clinical laboratories of China from 2015 to 2017.2015 年至 2017 年中国临床实验室总检测过程的 15 项质量指标的全国性调查。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Dec 19;57(2):195-203. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-0416.
10
Towards harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine.迈向实验室医学质量指标的协调统一。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013 Jan;51(1):187-95. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0582.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Laboratory Performance in Consideration with Pre analytical and Post analytical Quality Indicators.结合分析前和分析后质量指标评估实验室性能
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2024 Apr;39(2):264-270. doi: 10.1007/s12291-022-01094-0. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
2
Critical values notification: A nationwide survey of practices among clinical laboratories across Nigeria.危急值报告:尼日利亚全国临床实验室实践调查
Afr J Lab Med. 2023 Dec 15;12(1):2249. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2249. eCollection 2023.
3
Evaluation of 18 quality indicators from the external quality assurance preanalytical programme of the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC).
对西班牙检验医学学会(SEQC)外部质量保证分析前程序的18项质量指标进行评估。
Adv Lab Med. 2022 May 18;3(2):175-200. doi: 10.1515/almed-2021-0097. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Evaluation of preanalytical and postanalytical phases in clinical biochemistry laboratory according to IFCC laboratory errors and patient safety specifications.根据国际临床化学联合会(IFCC)实验室误差和患者安全规范评估临床生物化学实验室的分析前和分析后阶段。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2022 Oct 1;32(3):030701. doi: 10.11613/BM.2022.030701. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
5
Formalin pre-fixation improves autopsy histology.福尔马林预固定可改善尸检组织学。
Autops Case Rep. 2021 May 27;11:e2021291. doi: 10.4322/acr.2021.291. eCollection 2021.
6
Analysis of performance of clinical biochemistry laboratory using Sigma metrics and Quality Goal Index.使用西格玛指标和质量目标指数分析临床生物化学实验室的性能
Pract Lab Med. 2020 Dec 15;23:e00195. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00195. eCollection 2021 Jan.
7
Confidence interval of percentiles in skewed distribution: The importance of the actual coverage probability in practical quality applications for laboratory medicine.偏态分布百分位数的置信区间:在医学实验室实际质量应用中实际覆盖率概率的重要性。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2019 Oct 15;29(3):030101. doi: 10.11613/BM.2019.030101.
8
Confidence interval for quantiles and percentiles.分位数的置信区间。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2019 Feb 15;29(1):010101. doi: 10.11613/BM.2019.010101. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
9
Assessment of quality control system by sigma metrics and quality goal index ratio: A roadmap towards preparation for NABL.通过西格玛指标和质量目标指数比评估质量控制系统:迈向NABL准备工作的路线图。
World J Methodol. 2018 Nov 29;8(3):44-50. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v8.i3.44.
10
Implementation of the laboratory quality management system (ISO 15189): Experience from Bugando Medical Centre Clinical Laboratory - Mwanza, Tanzania.实验室质量管理体系(ISO 15189)的实施:来自坦桑尼亚姆万扎布甘多医疗中心临床实验室的经验
Afr J Lab Med. 2018 Jul 31;7(1):657. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v7i1.657. eCollection 2018.