• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健中的风险与收益:经济学视角

Risks and benefits in health care: the view from economics.

作者信息

Pauly Mark V

机构信息

Health Care Systems, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 May-Jun;26(3):653-62. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.653.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.653
PMID:17485740
Abstract

This paper discusses the meaning of the term risk from the economic perspective. It argues that some consumer decisions about insurance and the use of medical care are consistent with the economic model, but many are not. When decisions are inconsistent, real-world democratic governments' ability to intervene is limited by politicians' desire to please voters. The choice of incomplete insurance coverage in private markets is often said to present a case for governmental intervention, but the choice of insurance design in the Medicare drug benefit shows that the political process also may fail to select insurance that is optimal from an economic viewpoint.

摘要

本文从经济学角度探讨了“风险”一词的含义。文章认为,消费者在保险和医疗保健使用方面的一些决策与经济模型相符,但许多决策并非如此。当决策不一致时,现实世界中民主政府的干预能力受到政治家取悦选民愿望的限制。私人市场中不完全保险覆盖范围的选择常被认为是政府干预的一个理由,但医疗保险药品福利中保险设计的选择表明,政治过程也可能无法选择从经济角度看最优的保险。

相似文献

1
Risks and benefits in health care: the view from economics.医疗保健中的风险与收益:经济学视角
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 May-Jun;26(3):653-62. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.653.
2
Decisions, decisions, decisions.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Oct;5(10):1034-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.07.008.
3
Ethical values: the real crisis in health care.
Benefits Q. 1998;14(1):40-4.
4
Can China's health care be transplanted without China's economic policies?没有中国的经济政策,中国的医疗保健体系能移植吗?
N Engl J Med. 1979 Jun 28;300(26):1453-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197906283002603.
5
Implementing the Precautionary Principle: incorporating science, technology, fairness, and accountability in environmental, health, and safety decisions.实施预防原则:将科学、技术、公平性和问责制纳入环境、健康及安全决策之中。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004;17(1):59-67.
6
The political economy of health care.
N Engl J Med. 1979 Jun 28;300(26):1485-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197906283002610.
7
The economics of health care.
Orthopedics. 1991 Mar;14(3):377.
8
As Berlin Wall crumbles and two Germanies unite, health care problems emerge.随着柏林墙倒塌,两德统一,医疗保健问题浮现出来。
CMAJ. 1991 Jun 1;144(11):1511-2, 1514.
9
Health access America.
Kans Med. 1990 Apr;91(4):92, 95.
10
Health-care cost hikes: who's responsible?医疗保健成本上涨:谁该为此负责?
Ohio Med. 1990 Jan;86(1):21-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A formal risk-benefit framework for genomic tests: facilitating the appropriate translation of genomics into clinical practice.一个基因组测试的正式风险效益框架:促进基因组学向临床实践的适当转化。
Genet Med. 2010 Nov;12(11):686-93. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181eff533.