Holmes L, Chan W, Jiang Z, Du X L
Division of Pharmacy Administration & Public Health, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2007;10(4):388-95. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500973. Epub 2007 May 8.
Epidemiologic and experimental evidence suggests the effectiveness of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer (CaP) management. Although ADT has been increasingly used as mono-therapy in CaP, the survival benefit of ADT remains unclear. We examined the effectiveness of ADT in prolonging survival in a community-based cohort of 64 475 older men diagnosed with locoregional CaP, in 1992-1999 with last follow-up through December 2002, in 11 Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries. The effect of ADT on survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier's method, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards. After adjustment for propensity to receive ADT, the ADT and non-ADT groups were significantly different in the distribution of covariates except for comorbidity score and SEER registries. The crude overall mortality was significantly higher in cases with ADT compared with cases that received no ADT, hazard ratio (HR=1.54; 95% CI=1.50-1.58). However, mortality was substantially reduced (1.04, 1.00-1.08) after adjusting for standard care, socio-demographics, tumor characteristics, prognostic factors and chemotherapy. Therefore, ADT was not associated with significantly increased survival benefit for older men with locoregional CaP. Further studies may be needed to explore whether ADT is associated with other health benefits and the cost-effectiveness of these benefits.
流行病学和实验证据表明雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)在前列腺癌(CaP)治疗中具有有效性。尽管ADT越来越多地被用作CaP的单一疗法,但其生存获益仍不明确。我们在1992 - 1999年诊断为局部CaP的64475名老年男性的社区队列中,通过11个监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)登记处进行研究,观察ADT在延长生存期方面的有效性,最后随访至2002年12月。使用Kaplan - Meier方法、对数秩检验和Cox比例风险模型评估ADT对生存的影响。在对接受ADT的倾向进行调整后,除了合并症评分和SEER登记处外,ADT组和非ADT组在协变量分布上存在显著差异。与未接受ADT的病例相比,接受ADT的病例粗总死亡率显著更高,风险比(HR = 1.54;95% CI = 1.50 - 1.58)。然而,在对标准治疗、社会人口统计学、肿瘤特征、预后因素和化疗进行调整后,死亡率大幅降低(1.04,1.00 - 1.08)。因此,对于患有局部CaP的老年男性,ADT并未带来显著增加的生存获益。可能需要进一步研究来探讨ADT是否与其他健康益处相关以及这些益处的成本效益。