Spillane Caitriona B, Smith Jayden A, Morgan Joy L, Keene F Richard
School of Pharmacy and Molecular Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.
J Biol Inorg Chem. 2007 Aug;12(6):819-24. doi: 10.1007/s00775-007-0235-9. Epub 2007 May 8.
We have observed a number of discrepancies and contradictions in the use of a fluorescent intercalator displacement assay in surveying the binding affinities of dinuclear polypyridyl ruthenium(II) complexes with DNA. By a modification of the assay using the fluorescent minor-groove binder 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, rather than intercalating dyes (ethidium bromide or thiazole orange), results were obtained for all complexes studied which were consistent with relative affinities and stereoselectivities observed with other techniques, including NMR, affinity chromatography and equilibrium dialysis. It is believed that the difference in binding mode between the minor groove-binding Ru(II) complexes and the intercalating fluorescent dyes they are displacing may contribute to these discrepancies.
我们在使用荧光嵌入剂置换分析法测定双核多吡啶钌(II)配合物与DNA的结合亲和力时,观察到了一些差异和矛盾之处。通过对该分析法进行改进,使用荧光小沟结合剂4',6-二脒基-2-苯基吲哚,而非嵌入染料(溴化乙锭或噻唑橙),对所有研究的配合物都得到了与通过其他技术(包括核磁共振、亲和色谱和平衡透析)观察到的相对亲和力和立体选择性一致的结果。据信,小沟结合的钌(II)配合物与其所置换的嵌入荧光染料之间结合模式的差异可能导致了这些差异。