Miadlikowska Jolanta, Kauff Frank, Hofstetter Valérie, Fraker Emily, Grube Martin, Hafellner Josef, Reeb Valérie, Hodkinson Brendan P, Kukwa Martin, Lücking Robert, Hestmark Geir, Otalora Monica Garcia, Rauhut Alexandra, Büdel Burkhard, Scheidegger Christoph, Timdal Einar, Stenroos Soili, Brodo Irwin, Perlmutter Gary B, Ertz Damien, Diederich Paul, Lendemer James C, May Philip, Schoch Conrad L, Arnold A Elizabeth, Gueidan Cécile, Tripp Erin, Yahr Rebecca, Robertson Connie, Lutzoni François
Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0338, USA.
Mycologia. 2006 Nov-Dec;98(6):1088-103.
The Lecanoromycetes includes most of the lichen-forming fungal species (> 13500) and is therefore one of the most diverse class of all Fungi in terms of phenotypic complexity. We report phylogenetic relationships within the Lecanoromycetes resulting from Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses with complementary posterior probabilities and bootstrap support values based on three combined multilocus datasets using a supermatrix approach. Nine of 10 orders and 43 of 64 families currently recognized in Eriksson's classification of the Lecanoromycetes (Outline of Ascomycota--2006 Myconet 12:1-82) were represented in this sampling. Our analyses strongly support the Acarosporomycetidae and Ostropomycetidae as monophyletic, whereas the delimitation of the largest subclass, the Lecanoromycetidae, remains uncertain. Independent of future delimitation of the Lecanoromycetidae, the Rhizocarpaceae and Umbilicariaceae should be elevated to the ordinal level. This study shows that recent classifications include several nonmonophyletic taxa at different ranks that need to be recircumscribed. Our phylogenies confirm that ascus morphology cannot be applied consistently to shape the classification of lichen-forming fungi. The increasing amount of missing data associated with the progressive addition of taxa resulted in some cases in the expected loss of support, but we also observed an improvement in statistical support for many internodes. We conclude that a phylogenetic synthesis for a chosen taxonomic group should include a comprehensive assessment of phylogenetic confidence based on multiple estimates using different methods and on a progressive taxon sampling with an increasing number of taxa, even if it involves an increasing amount of missing data.
茶渍菌纲包含了大多数形成地衣的真菌物种(超过13500种),因此就表型复杂性而言,它是所有真菌中最多样化的类别之一。我们报告了基于三个联合多位点数据集,采用超级矩阵方法,通过贝叶斯分析和最大似然分析以及互补的后验概率和自展支持值所得到的茶渍菌纲内部的系统发育关系。在本次抽样中,代表了埃里克森对茶渍菌纲分类(子囊菌门大纲——2006年《菌网》12:1 - 82)中目前认可的10个目中的9个目以及64个科中的43个科。我们的分析有力地支持了刺孢菌科和疣衣菌科为单系类群,而最大的亚纲茶渍菌亚纲的界定仍不确定。无论茶渍菌亚纲未来如何界定,根盘衣科和脐衣科都应提升到目级水平。这项研究表明,最近的分类在不同等级中包含几个非单系类群,需要重新界定。我们的系统发育研究证实,子囊形态不能一致地应用于构建形成地衣真菌的分类。随着分类单元的逐步增加,缺失数据的数量不断增加,在某些情况下导致了预期的支持度损失,但我们也观察到许多节点的统计支持度有所提高。我们得出结论,对于选定的分类群进行系统发育综合分析时,应基于使用不同方法的多个估计以及随着分类单元数量增加的逐步分类群抽样,对系统发育置信度进行全面评估,即使这涉及到越来越多的缺失数据。